@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ use crate::option::Option::{None, Some};
1616use crate :: ptr;
1717use crate :: result:: Result ;
1818use crate :: result:: Result :: { Err , Ok } ;
19+ #[ cfg( not( miri) ) ] // Miri does not support all SIMD intrinsics
20+ use crate :: simd:: { self , Simd } ;
1921use crate :: slice;
2022
2123#[ unstable(
@@ -3512,6 +3514,123 @@ impl<T> [T] {
35123514 }
35133515 }
35143516
3517+ /// Split a slice into a prefix, a middle of aligned SIMD types, and a suffix.
3518+ ///
3519+ /// This is a safe wrapper around [`slice::align_to`], so has the same weak
3520+ /// postconditions as that method. You're only assured that
3521+ /// `self.len() == prefix.len() + middle.len() * LANES + suffix.len()`.
3522+ ///
3523+ /// Notably, all of the following are possible:
3524+ /// - `prefix.len() >= LANES`.
3525+ /// - `middle.is_empty()` despite `self.len() >= 3 * LANES`.
3526+ /// - `suffix.len() >= LANES`.
3527+ ///
3528+ /// That said, this is a safe method, so if you're only writing safe code,
3529+ /// then this can at most cause incorrect logic, not unsoundness.
3530+ ///
3531+ /// # Panics
3532+ ///
3533+ /// This will panic if the size of the SIMD type is different from
3534+ /// `LANES` times that of the scalar.
3535+ ///
3536+ /// At the time of writing, the trait restrictions on `Simd<T, LANES>` keeps
3537+ /// that from ever happening, as only power-of-two numbers of lanes are
3538+ /// supported. It's possible that, in the future, those restrictions might
3539+ /// be lifted in a way that would make it possible to see panics from this
3540+ /// method for something like `LANES == 3`.
3541+ ///
3542+ /// # Examples
3543+ ///
3544+ /// ```
3545+ /// #![feature(portable_simd)]
3546+ ///
3547+ /// let short = &[1, 2, 3];
3548+ /// let (prefix, middle, suffix) = short.as_simd::<4>();
3549+ /// assert_eq!(middle, []); // Not enough elements for anything in the middle
3550+ ///
3551+ /// // They might be split in any possible way between prefix and suffix
3552+ /// let it = prefix.iter().chain(suffix).copied();
3553+ /// assert_eq!(it.collect::<Vec<_>>(), vec![1, 2, 3]);
3554+ ///
3555+ /// fn basic_simd_sum(x: &[f32]) -> f32 {
3556+ /// use std::ops::Add;
3557+ /// use std::simd::f32x4;
3558+ /// let (prefix, middle, suffix) = x.as_simd();
3559+ /// let sums = f32x4::from_array([
3560+ /// prefix.iter().copied().sum(),
3561+ /// 0.0,
3562+ /// 0.0,
3563+ /// suffix.iter().copied().sum(),
3564+ /// ]);
3565+ /// let sums = middle.iter().copied().fold(sums, f32x4::add);
3566+ /// sums.horizontal_sum()
3567+ /// }
3568+ ///
3569+ /// let numbers: Vec<f32> = (1..101).map(|x| x as _).collect();
3570+ /// assert_eq!(basic_simd_sum(&numbers[1..99]), 4949.0);
3571+ /// ```
3572+ #[ unstable( feature = "portable_simd" , issue = "86656" ) ]
3573+ #[ cfg( not( miri) ) ] // Miri does not support all SIMD intrinsics
3574+ pub fn as_simd < const LANES : usize > ( & self ) -> ( & [ T ] , & [ Simd < T , LANES > ] , & [ T ] )
3575+ where
3576+ Simd < T , LANES > : AsRef < [ T ; LANES ] > ,
3577+ T : simd:: SimdElement ,
3578+ simd:: LaneCount < LANES > : simd:: SupportedLaneCount ,
3579+ {
3580+ // These are expected to always match, as vector types are laid out like
3581+ // arrays per <https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#vector-type>, but we
3582+ // might as well double-check since it'll optimize away anyhow.
3583+ assert_eq ! ( mem:: size_of:: <Simd <T , LANES >>( ) , mem:: size_of:: <[ T ; LANES ] >( ) ) ;
3584+
3585+ // SAFETY: The simd types have the same layout as arrays, just with
3586+ // potentially-higher alignment, so the de-facto transmutes are sound.
3587+ unsafe { self . align_to ( ) }
3588+ }
3589+
3590+ /// Split a slice into a prefix, a middle of aligned SIMD types, and a suffix.
3591+ ///
3592+ /// This is a safe wrapper around [`slice::align_to_mut`], so has the same weak
3593+ /// postconditions as that method. You're only assured that
3594+ /// `self.len() == prefix.len() + middle.len() * LANES + suffix.len()`.
3595+ ///
3596+ /// Notably, all of the following are possible:
3597+ /// - `prefix.len() >= LANES`.
3598+ /// - `middle.is_empty()` despite `self.len() >= 3 * LANES`.
3599+ /// - `suffix.len() >= LANES`.
3600+ ///
3601+ /// That said, this is a safe method, so if you're only writing safe code,
3602+ /// then this can at most cause incorrect logic, not unsoundness.
3603+ ///
3604+ /// This is the mutable version of [`slice::as_simd`]; see that for examples.
3605+ ///
3606+ /// # Panics
3607+ ///
3608+ /// This will panic if the size of the SIMD type is different from
3609+ /// `LANES` times that of the scalar.
3610+ ///
3611+ /// At the time of writing, the trait restrictions on `Simd<T, LANES>` keeps
3612+ /// that from ever happening, as only power-of-two numbers of lanes are
3613+ /// supported. It's possible that, in the future, those restrictions might
3614+ /// be lifted in a way that would make it possible to see panics from this
3615+ /// method for something like `LANES == 3`.
3616+ #[ unstable( feature = "portable_simd" , issue = "86656" ) ]
3617+ #[ cfg( not( miri) ) ] // Miri does not support all SIMD intrinsics
3618+ pub fn as_simd_mut < const LANES : usize > ( & mut self ) -> ( & mut [ T ] , & mut [ Simd < T , LANES > ] , & mut [ T ] )
3619+ where
3620+ Simd < T , LANES > : AsMut < [ T ; LANES ] > ,
3621+ T : simd:: SimdElement ,
3622+ simd:: LaneCount < LANES > : simd:: SupportedLaneCount ,
3623+ {
3624+ // These are expected to always match, as vector types are laid out like
3625+ // arrays per <https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#vector-type>, but we
3626+ // might as well double-check since it'll optimize away anyhow.
3627+ assert_eq ! ( mem:: size_of:: <Simd <T , LANES >>( ) , mem:: size_of:: <[ T ; LANES ] >( ) ) ;
3628+
3629+ // SAFETY: The simd types have the same layout as arrays, just with
3630+ // potentially-higher alignment, so the de-facto transmutes are sound.
3631+ unsafe { self . align_to_mut ( ) }
3632+ }
3633+
35153634 /// Checks if the elements of this slice are sorted.
35163635 ///
35173636 /// That is, for each element `a` and its following element `b`, `a <= b` must hold. If the
0 commit comments