Rename some compare_method functions

Author: compiler-errors

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/check.rs

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ use crate::check::intrinsicck::InlineAsmCtxt;
 use crate::errors::LinkageType;
 
 use super::compare_method::check_type_bounds;
-use super::compare_method::{compare_impl_method, compare_ty_impl};
+use super::compare_method::{compare_impl_method, compare_impl_ty};
 use super::*;
 use rustc_attr as attr;
 use rustc_errors::{Applicability, ErrorGuaranteed, MultiSpan};
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ fn check_impl_items_against_trait<'tcx>(
         let impl_item_full = tcx.hir().impl_item(impl_item.id);
         match impl_item_full.kind {
             hir::ImplItemKind::Const(..) => {
-                let _ = tcx.compare_assoc_const_impl_item_with_trait_item((
+                let _ = tcx.compare_impl_const((
                     impl_item.id.owner_id.def_id,
                     ty_impl_item.trait_item_def_id.unwrap(),
                 ));
@@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ fn check_impl_items_against_trait<'tcx>(
             }
             hir::ImplItemKind::Type(impl_ty) => {
                 let opt_trait_span = tcx.hir().span_if_local(ty_trait_item.def_id);
-                compare_ty_impl(
+                compare_impl_ty(
                     tcx,
                     &ty_impl_item,
                     impl_ty.span,

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/compare_method.rs

@@ -1516,8 +1516,8 @@ fn compare_generic_param_kinds<'tcx>(
     Ok(())
 }
 
-/// Use `tcx.compare_assoc_const_impl_item_with_trait_item` instead
-pub(crate) fn raw_compare_const_impl(
+/// Use `tcx.compare_impl_const` instead
+pub(crate) fn compare_impl_const_raw(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'_>,
     (impl_const_item_def, trait_const_item_def): (LocalDefId, DefId),
 ) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
@@ -1623,7 +1623,7 @@ pub(crate) fn raw_compare_const_impl(
     Ok(())
 }
 
-pub(crate) fn compare_ty_impl<'tcx>(
+pub(crate) fn compare_impl_ty<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
     impl_ty: &ty::AssocItem,
     impl_ty_span: Span,

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/mod.rs

@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ pub fn provide(providers: &mut Providers) {
         check_mod_item_types,
         region_scope_tree,
         collect_trait_impl_trait_tys,
-        compare_assoc_const_impl_item_with_trait_item: compare_method::raw_compare_const_impl,
+        compare_impl_const: compare_method::compare_impl_const_raw,
         ..*providers
     };
 }

compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/error_reporting/mod.rs

@@ -1836,7 +1836,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeErrCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
 
         // In some (most?) cases cause.body_id points to actual body, but in some cases
         // it's an actual definition. According to the comments (e.g. in
-        // rustc_hir_analysis/check/compare_method.rs:compare_predicate_entailment) the latter
+        // rustc_hir_analysis/check/compare_method.rs:compare_method_predicate_entailment) the latter
         // is relied upon by some other code. This might (or might not) need cleanup.
         let body_owner_def_id =
             self.tcx.hir().opt_local_def_id(cause.body_id).unwrap_or_else(|| {

compiler/rustc_middle/src/query/mod.rs

@@ -2117,7 +2117,7 @@ rustc_queries! {
         desc { "checking to see if `{}` permits being left zeroed", key.ty }
     }
 
-    query compare_assoc_const_impl_item_with_trait_item(
+    query compare_impl_const(
         key: (LocalDefId, DefId)
     ) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
         desc { |tcx| "checking assoc const `{}` has the same type as trait item", tcx.def_path_str(key.0.to_def_id()) }

compiler/rustc_ty_utils/src/instance.rs

@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ fn resolve_associated_item<'tcx>(
                 && trait_item_id != leaf_def.item.def_id
                 && let Some(leaf_def_item) = leaf_def.item.def_id.as_local()
             {
-                tcx.compare_assoc_const_impl_item_with_trait_item((
+                tcx.compare_impl_const((
                     leaf_def_item,
                     trait_item_id,
                 ))?;