Skip to content

Conversation

@skpanagiotis
Copy link
Collaborator

@skpanagiotis skpanagiotis commented May 6, 2025

  • Regenerate all .po files with make merge.
  • Update Makefile with new cpython commit hash of 3.13
  • Update translation and fuzzies

@lysnikolaou
Copy link
Member

Like the other day, I'll mostly trust that this has gone as expected. One question only: Should we maybe wait to update with the commit that'll become the 3.14.0b1 release?

Also, after this is merged, we should update the default branch and change the base for all open PRs.

@skpanagiotis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I agree that we shouldn't wait.

As soon as we start the translation based on 3.12 and as Python releases new versions, we can maintain the docs accordingly. This means that when 3.14.0b1 is released, we can add a new branch for this version while continuing to support 3.12 and 3.13.

Additionally, I believe the best approach is to focus our efforts on translating 3.12 first. When we will have make a small progress we can efficiently transfer thoses translations to newer vesions like 3.13 and 3.14.0b1.

Regarding the branch strategy, I suggest keeping the 3.12 as the default branch for now. However for the short future I suggest having a default branch as a 'master', dedicated to overall project documenation like README and contribution guidelines. This branch will guide contributors with the clear milestone of translating 3.12 files, with future version updates building on this foundation.

Copy link
Member

@lysnikolaou lysnikolaou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We synced offline with @skpanagiotis and figured out a branching plan for the future. Let's get this in so that we can start working on 3.13 and hopefully get the translation into the upstream language picker.

Copy link
Collaborator

@thepetk thepetk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm <3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants