ratelimit: Fix data-races in ___ratelimit().

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160073
Upstream Status: linux.git

commit 6bae8ce
Author: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date:   Tue Aug 23 10:46:48 2022 -0700

    ratelimit: Fix data-races in ___ratelimit().

    While reading rs->interval and rs->burst, they can be changed
    concurrently via sysctl (e.g. net_ratelimit_state).  Thus, we
    need to add READ_ONCE() to their readers.

    Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
    Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>

Author: Guillaume Nault

lib/ratelimit.c

@@ -26,10 +26,16 @@
  */
 int ___ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs, const char *func)
 {
+	/* Paired with WRITE_ONCE() in .proc_handler().
+	 * Changing two values seperately could be inconsistent
+	 * and some message could be lost.  (See: net_ratelimit_state).
+	 */
+	int interval = READ_ONCE(rs->interval);
+	int burst = READ_ONCE(rs->burst);
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!rs->interval)
+	if (!interval)
 		return 1;
 
 	/*
@@ -44,7 +50,7 @@ int ___ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs, const char *func)
 	if (!rs->begin)
 		rs->begin = jiffies;
 
-	if (time_is_before_jiffies(rs->begin + rs->interval)) {
+	if (time_is_before_jiffies(rs->begin + interval)) {
 		if (rs->missed) {
 			if (!(rs->flags & RATELIMIT_MSG_ON_RELEASE)) {
 				printk_deferred(KERN_WARNING
@@ -56,7 +62,7 @@ int ___ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs, const char *func)
 		rs->begin   = jiffies;
 		rs->printed = 0;
 	}
-	if (rs->burst && rs->burst > rs->printed) {
+	if (burst && burst > rs->printed) {
 		rs->printed++;
 		ret = 1;
 	} else {