x86/module: Fix the paravirt vs alternative order

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170197
Conflicts: Minor context diffs in the first hunk due to the presence of
	   later upstream commit ed53a0d ("x86/alternative:
	   Use .ibt_endbr_seal to seal indirect calls") and commit
	   15e6722 ("x86: Undo return-thunk damage").

commit 5adf349
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:23:23 +0100

    x86/module: Fix the paravirt vs alternative order

    Ever since commit

      4e62921 ("x86/paravirt: Add new features for paravirt patching")

    there is an ordering dependency between patching paravirt ops and
    patching alternatives, the module loader still violates this.

    Fixes: 4e62921 ("x86/paravirt: Add new features for paravirt patching")
    Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
    Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
    Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
    Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220303112825.068773913@infradead.org

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

Author: Waiman-Long

arch/x86/kernel/module.c

@@ -277,6 +277,14 @@ int module_finalize(const Elf_Ehdr *hdr,
 			ibt_endbr = s;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * See alternative_instructions() for the ordering rules between the
+	 * various patching types.
+	 */
+	if (para) {
+		void *pseg = (void *)para->sh_addr;
+		apply_paravirt(pseg, pseg + para->sh_size);
+	}
 	if (retpolines) {
 		void *rseg = (void *)retpolines->sh_addr;
 		apply_retpolines(rseg, rseg + retpolines->sh_size);
@@ -302,11 +310,6 @@ int module_finalize(const Elf_Ehdr *hdr,
 					    tseg, tseg + text->sh_size);
 	}
 
-	if (para) {
-		void *pseg = (void *)para->sh_addr;
-		apply_paravirt(pseg, pseg + para->sh_size);
-	}
-
 	/* make jump label nops */
 	jump_label_apply_nops(me);