|
2 | 2 |
|
3 | 3 | ## 1. Summary |
4 | 4 |
|
5 | | -The purpose of documentation using PHPDoc is to provide a comprehensive but flexible way to describe a software system |
6 | | -at the smallest possible level of detail. This type of documentation aids contributors and consumers of your source |
7 | | -code to, for example, understand what type of information needs to be passed to specific methods, or how to be able to |
8 | | -consume a class of the project that a consumer want to use. |
9 | | - |
10 | | -By documenting specific elements inside the source code, the documentation for that part of the source code will be less |
11 | | -susceptible to becoming out of date. |
12 | | - |
13 | 5 | PHPDoc as a notation was first presented in 2000 by Ulf Wendel, is heavily inspired by JavaDoc, |
14 | 6 | and is currently in use by a significant percentage of public PHP projects in the field. |
15 | 7 |
|
16 | 8 | ## 2. Why Bother? |
17 | 9 |
|
18 | | -PHPDocumentor has spearheaded and facilitated the growth of the PHPDoc notation, but with the growing number of other |
19 | | -tools that use the PHPDoc notation, it is becoming increasingly important to have an official and formal standard |
20 | | -instead of the de-facto status that is currently provided. |
| 10 | +PHPDocumentor has facilitated the growth of the PHPDoc notation, but with the growing number of other |
| 11 | +tools that use the PHPDoc notation, it is becoming increasingly important to have a formal standard |
| 12 | +instead of its de-facto status. |
21 | 13 |
|
22 | 14 | Pros: |
23 | 15 |
|
24 | 16 | * Developers (consumers) have a common reference to refer to when confronted with PHPDoc. |
25 | 17 | * Projects and their Developers (contributors) have an authoritative reference which they can consult. |
26 | 18 | * IDE vendors can standardize the way they use PHPDoc to aid in concerns such as auto-completion and navigation. |
27 | | -* Projects using the PHPDoc data to complement their functionality, such as Documentation generators or applications |
28 | | - using annotations, will have a common language with their consumers. |
29 | | -* Missing functionality can be described and implemented by aforementioned stakeholders. |
| 19 | +* Projects using the PHPDoc data to complement their functionality, such as Documentation generators or static |
| 20 | + analysis tools, will have a common language with their consumers. |
30 | 21 |
|
31 | 22 | Cons: |
32 | 23 |
|
@@ -77,14 +68,12 @@ Cons: |
77 | 68 |
|
78 | 69 | ### 5.2 Sponsor |
79 | 70 |
|
80 | | - * Michael Cullum - [PHP-FIG](https://www.php-fig.org/) |
| 71 | + * Ken Guest - [PHP-FIG](https://www.php-fig.org/) |
81 | 72 |
|
82 | | -### 5.3 Working group members |
| 73 | +### 5.3 Working Group members |
83 | 74 |
|
84 | | - * Alexey Gopachenko - [PhpStorm](https://www.jetbrains.com/phpstorm) |
85 | | - * Matthew Brown - [Psalm](https://github.com/vimeo/psalm) |
86 | | - * Jan Tvrdík - [PHPStan](https://github.com/phpstan/phpstan) |
87 | 75 | * Jaap van Otterdijk - [phpDocumentor](https://github.com/phpDocumentor/phpDocumentor2) |
| 76 | + * Alexander Makarov - [Yii](https://github.com/yiisoft/yii2) |
88 | 77 |
|
89 | 78 | ## 6. Votes |
90 | 79 |
|
|
0 commit comments