|
4 | 4 | import static dev.openfeature.sdk.testutils.stubbing.ConditionStubber.doDelayResponse; |
5 | 5 | import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat; |
6 | 6 | import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThatCode; |
| 7 | +import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThatThrownBy; |
7 | 8 | import static org.awaitility.Awaitility.await; |
8 | 9 | import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.any; |
9 | 10 | import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.eq; |
@@ -363,6 +364,104 @@ void shouldNotHangIndefinitelyOnShutdown() { |
363 | 364 | return true; |
364 | 365 | }); |
365 | 366 | } |
| 367 | + |
| 368 | + @Test |
| 369 | + @DisplayName("should handle shutdown during provider initialization") |
| 370 | + void shouldHandleShutdownDuringProviderInitialization() throws Exception { |
| 371 | + FeatureProvider slowInitProvider = createMockedProvider(); |
| 372 | + AtomicBoolean initStarted = new AtomicBoolean(false); |
| 373 | + AtomicBoolean shutdownCalled = new AtomicBoolean(false); |
| 374 | + |
| 375 | + doAnswer(invocation -> { |
| 376 | + initStarted.set(true); |
| 377 | + Thread.sleep(500); |
| 378 | + return null; |
| 379 | + }) |
| 380 | + .when(slowInitProvider) |
| 381 | + .initialize(any()); |
| 382 | + |
| 383 | + doAnswer(invocation -> { |
| 384 | + shutdownCalled.set(true); |
| 385 | + return null; |
| 386 | + }) |
| 387 | + .when(slowInitProvider) |
| 388 | + .shutdown(); |
| 389 | + |
| 390 | + providerRepository.setProvider(slowInitProvider, mockAfterSet(), mockAfterInit(), mockAfterShutdown(), mockAfterError(), false); |
| 391 | + |
| 392 | + await().atMost(Duration.ofSeconds(1)).untilTrue(initStarted); |
| 393 | + |
| 394 | + // Call shutdown while initialization is in progress |
| 395 | + assertThatCode(() -> providerRepository.shutdown()).doesNotThrowAnyException(); |
| 396 | + |
| 397 | + await().atMost(Duration.ofSeconds(1)).untilTrue(shutdownCalled); |
| 398 | + verify(slowInitProvider, times(1)).shutdown(); |
| 399 | + } |
| 400 | + |
| 401 | + @Test |
| 402 | + @DisplayName("should handle provider replacement during shutdown") |
| 403 | + void shouldHandleProviderReplacementDuringShutdown() throws Exception { |
| 404 | + FeatureProvider oldProvider = createMockedProvider(); |
| 405 | + FeatureProvider newProvider = createMockedProvider(); |
| 406 | + AtomicBoolean oldProviderShutdownCalled = new AtomicBoolean(false); |
| 407 | + |
| 408 | + doAnswer(invocation -> { |
| 409 | + oldProviderShutdownCalled.set(true); |
| 410 | + return null; |
| 411 | + }) |
| 412 | + .when(oldProvider) |
| 413 | + .shutdown(); |
| 414 | + |
| 415 | + providerRepository.setProvider(oldProvider, mockAfterSet(), mockAfterInit(), mockAfterShutdown(), mockAfterError(), true); |
| 416 | + |
| 417 | + // Replace provider (this will trigger old provider shutdown in background) |
| 418 | + providerRepository.setProvider(newProvider, mockAfterSet(), mockAfterInit(), mockAfterShutdown(), mockAfterError(), false); |
| 419 | + |
| 420 | + assertThatCode(() -> providerRepository.shutdown()).doesNotThrowAnyException(); |
| 421 | + |
| 422 | + await().atMost(Duration.ofSeconds(1)).untilTrue(oldProviderShutdownCalled); |
| 423 | + verify(oldProvider, times(1)).shutdown(); |
| 424 | + verify(newProvider, times(1)).shutdown(); |
| 425 | + } |
| 426 | + |
| 427 | + @Test |
| 428 | + @DisplayName("should prevent adding providers after shutdown has started") |
| 429 | + void shouldPreventAddingProvidersAfterShutdownHasStarted() { |
| 430 | + FeatureProvider provider = createMockedProvider(); |
| 431 | + setFeatureProvider(provider); |
| 432 | + |
| 433 | + providerRepository.shutdown(); |
| 434 | + |
| 435 | + FeatureProvider newProvider = createMockedProvider(); |
| 436 | + assertThatThrownBy(() -> providerRepository.setProvider( |
| 437 | + newProvider, mockAfterSet(), mockAfterInit(), mockAfterShutdown(), mockAfterError(), false)) |
| 438 | + .isInstanceOf(IllegalStateException.class) |
| 439 | + .hasMessageContaining("shutting down"); |
| 440 | + } |
| 441 | + |
| 442 | + @Test |
| 443 | + @DisplayName("should handle concurrent shutdown calls gracefully") |
| 444 | + void shouldHandleConcurrentShutdownCallsGracefully() { |
| 445 | + FeatureProvider provider = createMockedProvider(); |
| 446 | + setFeatureProvider(provider); |
| 447 | + |
| 448 | + assertThatCode(() -> { |
| 449 | + Thread t1 = new Thread(() -> providerRepository.shutdown()); |
| 450 | + Thread t2 = new Thread(() -> providerRepository.shutdown()); |
| 451 | + Thread t3 = new Thread(() -> providerRepository.shutdown()); |
| 452 | + |
| 453 | + t1.start(); |
| 454 | + t2.start(); |
| 455 | + t3.start(); |
| 456 | + |
| 457 | + t1.join(TIMEOUT); |
| 458 | + t2.join(TIMEOUT); |
| 459 | + t3.join(TIMEOUT); |
| 460 | + }) |
| 461 | + .doesNotThrowAnyException(); |
| 462 | + |
| 463 | + verify(provider, times(1)).shutdown(); |
| 464 | + } |
366 | 465 | } |
367 | 466 | } |
368 | 467 |
|
|
0 commit comments