Add option to dedot imports

[aidandj]

Closes #652

[nipunn1313]

sure!

One high level thought - if we proliferate the number of boolean args / options, it will be hard to maintain the full intersection of optionality (number of configurations grows exponentially with number of bool args).

What's the goal here from dedotting? If there's some way to achieve the goal with defaults, it's worth considering. If it's a true option - then maybe we can just add the option.

[aidandj]

sure!

One high level thought - if we proliferate the number of boolean args / options, it will be hard to maintain the full intersection of optionality (number of configurations grows exponentially with number of bool args).

What's the goal here from dedotting? If there's some way to achieve the goal with defaults, it's worth considering. If it's a true option - then maybe we can just add the option.

This is sort of an experiment to see if it solves the request in the linked issue. I consider it a breaking change because I know for a fact people are manipulating import statements (I do it).