Skip to content

Conversation

@Philip-R-Beckwith
Copy link

@Philip-R-Beckwith Philip-R-Beckwith commented Nov 19, 2025

Description

Changes the selector to match what GKE Autopilot enforces when the user set's the provider config to GKE_AUTOPILOT.
Also gives the user the ability to set resource constraints on the jobs that are created with this repo.
When set GKE Autopilot will not warn the customer about them not being set.

Without setting the provider and resources:
Screenshot 2025-11-19 at 10 00 10 AM

After setting provider && Resources:
Screenshot 2025-11-19 at 9 51 03 AM

Type of change

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • New feature / enhancement (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Security fix
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist:

  • Add changelog entry following the contributing guide
  • Documentation has been updated
  • This change requires changes in testing:
    • unit tests
    • E2E tests

@Philip-R-Beckwith Philip-R-Beckwith requested a review from a team as a code owner November 19, 2025 18:06
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 19, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 51.93%. Comparing base (0a36fa7) to head (894f170).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #671   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   51.93%   51.93%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         233      233           
=======================================
  Hits          121      121           
  Misses        107      107           
  Partials        5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants