Skip to content

Component field naming: name or longname? #258

@wpbonelli

Description

@wpbonelli

imod-python simulation/model/package objects use the DFN longname for field naming, rather than the terser name MF6/FloPy use. This is clearer and more accessible, if more verbose. The imod-python developers suggest doing the same in flopy 4.x, though this may increase the difficulty of migrating flopy 3.x scripts to 4.x, or perhaps finding a way to support either/both (longname via kwargs? duplicate package classes wrapping the normal ones? latter would be easy enough to generate)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requestfrontendRelated to the user-facing APIquestionInformation or decisions required

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions