@@ -17191,30 +17191,38 @@ namespace ts {
1719117191 getEffectiveTypeAnnotationNode(declaration as VariableDeclaration | ParameterDeclaration | PropertyDeclaration | PropertySignature));
1719217192 }
1719317193
17194- function getExplicitTypeOfSymbol(symbol: Symbol) {
17195- return symbol.flags & (SymbolFlags.Function | SymbolFlags.Method | SymbolFlags.Class | SymbolFlags.ValueModule) ||
17196- symbol.flags & (SymbolFlags.Variable | SymbolFlags.Property) && isDeclarationWithExplicitTypeAnnotation(symbol.valueDeclaration) ?
17197- getTypeOfSymbol(symbol) : undefined;
17194+ function getExplicitTypeOfSymbol(symbol: Symbol, diagnostic?: Diagnostic) {
17195+ if (symbol.flags & (SymbolFlags.Function | SymbolFlags.Method | SymbolFlags.Class | SymbolFlags.ValueModule)) {
17196+ return getTypeOfSymbol(symbol);
17197+ }
17198+ if (symbol.flags & (SymbolFlags.Variable | SymbolFlags.Property)) {
17199+ if (isDeclarationWithExplicitTypeAnnotation(symbol.valueDeclaration)) {
17200+ return getTypeOfSymbol(symbol);
17201+ }
17202+ if (diagnostic && symbol.valueDeclaration) {
17203+ addRelatedInfo(diagnostic, createDiagnosticForNode(symbol.valueDeclaration, Diagnostics._0_is_declared_here, symbolToString(symbol)));
17204+ }
17205+ }
1719817206 }
1719917207
1720017208 // We require the dotted function name in an assertion expression to be comprised of identifiers
1720117209 // that reference function, method, class or value module symbols; or variable, property or
1720217210 // parameter symbols with declarations that have explicit type annotations. Such references are
1720317211 // resolvable with no possibility of triggering circularities in control flow analysis.
17204- function getTypeOfDottedName(node: Expression): Type | undefined {
17212+ function getTypeOfDottedName(node: Expression, diagnostic: Diagnostic | undefined ): Type | undefined {
1720517213 if (!(node.flags & NodeFlags.InWithStatement)) {
1720617214 switch (node.kind) {
1720717215 case SyntaxKind.Identifier:
1720817216 const symbol = getExportSymbolOfValueSymbolIfExported(getResolvedSymbol(<Identifier>node));
17209- return getExplicitTypeOfSymbol(symbol.flags & SymbolFlags.Alias ? resolveAlias(symbol) : symbol);
17217+ return getExplicitTypeOfSymbol(symbol.flags & SymbolFlags.Alias ? resolveAlias(symbol) : symbol, diagnostic );
1721017218 case SyntaxKind.ThisKeyword:
1721117219 return getExplicitThisType(node);
1721217220 case SyntaxKind.PropertyAccessExpression:
17213- const type = getTypeOfDottedName((<PropertyAccessExpression>node).expression);
17221+ const type = getTypeOfDottedName((<PropertyAccessExpression>node).expression, diagnostic );
1721417222 const prop = type && getPropertyOfType(type, (<PropertyAccessExpression>node).name.escapedText);
17215- return prop && getExplicitTypeOfSymbol(prop);
17223+ return prop && getExplicitTypeOfSymbol(prop, diagnostic );
1721617224 case SyntaxKind.ParenthesizedExpression:
17217- return getTypeOfDottedName((<ParenthesizedExpression>node).expression);
17225+ return getTypeOfDottedName((<ParenthesizedExpression>node).expression, diagnostic );
1721817226 }
1721917227 }
1722017228 }
@@ -17227,7 +17235,7 @@ namespace ts {
1722717235 // expressions are potential type predicate function calls. In order to avoid triggering
1722817236 // circularities in control flow analysis, we use getTypeOfDottedName when resolving the call
1722917237 // target expression of an assertion.
17230- const funcType = node.parent.kind === SyntaxKind.ExpressionStatement ? getTypeOfDottedName(node.expression) :
17238+ const funcType = node.parent.kind === SyntaxKind.ExpressionStatement ? getTypeOfDottedName(node.expression, /*diagnostic*/ undefined ) :
1723117239 node.expression.kind !== SyntaxKind.SuperKeyword ? checkNonNullExpression(node.expression) :
1723217240 undefined;
1723317241 const signatures = getSignaturesOfType(funcType && getApparentType(funcType) || unknownType, SignatureKind.Call);
@@ -23417,12 +23425,13 @@ namespace ts {
2341723425 return getESSymbolLikeTypeForNode(walkUpParenthesizedExpressions(node.parent));
2341823426 }
2341923427 if (node.kind === SyntaxKind.CallExpression && node.parent.kind === SyntaxKind.ExpressionStatement &&
23420- returnType.flags & ( TypeFlags.Void | TypeFlags.Never) && hasTypePredicateOrNeverReturnType (signature)) {
23428+ returnType.flags & TypeFlags.Void && getTypePredicateOfSignature (signature)) {
2342123429 if (!isDottedName(node.expression)) {
23422- error(node.expression, Diagnostics.Control_flow_effects_of_calls_to_assertion_and_never_returning_functions_are_reflected_only_when_the_function_expression_is_an_identifier_or_qualified_name );
23430+ error(node.expression, Diagnostics.Assertions_require_the_call_target_to_be_an_identifier_or_qualified_name );
2342323431 }
2342423432 else if (!getEffectsSignature(node)) {
23425- error(node.expression, Diagnostics.Control_flow_effects_of_calls_to_assertion_and_never_returning_functions_are_reflected_only_when_every_variable_or_property_referenced_in_the_function_expression_is_declared_with_an_explicit_type_annotation);
23433+ const diagnostic = error(node.expression, Diagnostics.Assertions_require_every_name_in_the_call_target_to_be_declared_with_an_explicit_type_annotation);
23434+ getTypeOfDottedName(node.expression, diagnostic);
2342623435 }
2342723436 }
2342823437 let jsAssignmentType: Type | undefined;
0 commit comments