Duplicate UniqueID/UniqueID2 For Tracking Grenades Over Time

[David-Durst]

Describe the bug
UniqueID and UniqueID2 aren't unique for different grenades.

I want to use e.Projectile.WeaponInstance.UniqueID2() in events.GrenadeProjectileThrow and e.Grenade.UniqueID2 in events.HeExplode (and similar events) to track grenades over time. Here is my full code: https://github.com/David-Durst/csknow/blob/4e115f7314cb23eb3ba6d4764611731ffe568c3e/demo_parser/internal/parse_tick_data.go#L196-L308

To Reproduce
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Qv7MoXoEIrA5leIfpzmOk1mRBdtDeqZQ/view?usp=sharing

Code:

	lastID := ulid.Make()
	p.RegisterEventHandler(func(e events.GrenadeProjectileThrow) {
		if lastID == e.Projectile.WeaponInstance.UniqueID2() {
			fmt.Printf("duplicate unique ids")
		}
		lastID = e.Projectile.WeaponInstance.UniqueID2()
	})

Expected behavior
"duplicate unique ids" should never print.

Instead, there are duplicate ids, so they print out.

Library version
v3.0.2-0.20220908193112-50f55785b7a0

Additional context
Ubuntu 22.04

[David-Durst]

Duplicate id's happen quite frequently (seems like 5-10% of grenades). In the old version of my parser, I kept a list of duplicate ids and assumed that grenades exploded in the same they are launched. This worked reasonably well, as it seems that most of the duplicates were flashes, and flashes have a fixed fuse length. However, that approach is janky. I would prefer if unique ids were actually unique.

[David-Durst]

Here's another demo https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ajifwQNd0BPPg9CXl038NfNrjrOmwTr4/view?usp=sharing. It's much newer (so no demo file structure issues), but it has the same problem. In particular, see IngameTick 35082. Niko's first flash explodes just after he throws another flash. These flashes exist simultaneously but the parser assigns them the same UniqueID/UniqueID2. This is checked both with version v3.0.2-0.20220908193112-50f55785b7a0 and v2.13.0 (the old version of the library I used until my refactor this past week).

[markus-wa]

interesting picture when looking at ticks

seems like there's always 2 events on those ticks - it's probably actually the same entity and we just get some dupe events

[markus-wa]

seems to always be flashbangs

I think this is because players can have 2 flashbangs in the inventory, and we just get the item from the player inventory by type

[David-Durst]

I'm not seeing it on the same tick. I'm filtering out those duplicate events on same tick and still seeing the duplciate id issue.

The flashbang thing makes sense. I've only seen it when players throw flashes quickly one after another.

[David-Durst]

Which demo are you using?

[markus-wa]

right - I remember this now
the tick doesn't matter actually

having 2 flashbangs counts as 1 weapon

think of it as a gun that can shoot flashbangs, and you have 2 ammo

so it makes sense that the two unique IDs are the same, because the flashbangs are coming from the same "stash"

[David-Durst]

Is there a way to make uniqueid actually unique? like create a new one for each "flashbang bullet"?

[markus-wa]

What's the underlying goal here? this seems like a XY problem

[markus-wa]

can you use Projectile.UniqueID()?

might need to add a V2 there as well

[markus-wa]

e.g. https://github.com/markus-wa/demoinfocs-golang/blob/master/examples/nade-trajectories/nade_trajectories.go#L69

[David-Durst]

The goal is to record the ticks when a grenade is thrown, destroyed, it's effect is active, and it's effect expires. I also want to link the grenade to it's trajectory.

[David-Durst]

There certainly are other approaches (like matching the trajectory starting points of the grenades), but the cleanest for me would be using Grenade.UniqueId(), so hoping there's a solution using that.

[markus-wa]

I see - that makes sense and I agree currently there is no nice solution to this.

I think this is probably quite tricky to implement, but I'm certainly open for suggestions on how to do this,

I can think about it for a bit as well but tbh I'm stretched very thin right now and my priorities are currently elsewhere, so I may be a bit slow on this.