Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

It seems you should be using HasMany and a combination of HasOne::ofMany field instead.

Replies: 2 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by crynobone
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #4310 on May 26, 2022 00:02.