Update README of hint processor section

[DiegoCivi]

Update README of hint processor section

Description

The README on the hint processor section was outdated

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     22.723 s ±  0.018 s    [User: 21.831 s, System: 0.890 s]
  Range (min … max):   22.711 s … 22.736 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     22.812 s ±  0.080 s    [User: 21.958 s, System: 0.851 s]
  Range (min … max):   22.755 s … 22.868 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     12.159 s ±  0.006 s    [User: 21.914 s, System: 0.841 s]
  Range (min … max):   12.155 s … 12.163 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     12.214 s ±  0.015 s    [User: 22.028 s, System: 0.856 s]
  Range (min … max):   12.204 s … 12.225 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.672 s ±  0.198 s    [User: 34.851 s, System: 1.069 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.532 s …  9.812 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.727 s ±  0.438 s    [User: 34.834 s, System: 1.075 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.417 s … 10.037 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 4 ran
    1.01 ± 0.05 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.716 s ±  0.384 s    [User: 34.852 s, System: 1.071 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.445 s …  9.988 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.765 s ±  0.096 s    [User: 34.866 s, System: 1.066 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.697 s …  9.833 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 6 ran
    1.01 ± 0.04 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.465 s ±  0.128 s    [User: 35.523 s, System: 1.122 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.374 s …  9.556 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.565 s ±  0.160 s    [User: 35.187 s, System: 1.094 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.451 s …  9.678 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 8 ran
    1.01 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.526 s ±  0.025 s    [User: 35.730 s, System: 1.234 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.508 s …  9.544 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):      9.404 s ±  0.038 s    [User: 35.687 s, System: 1.212 s]
  Range (min … max):    9.377 s …  9.431 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 16 ran
    1.01 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	1.941 ± 0.025	1.920	2.004	1.00
head big_factorial	1.953 ± 0.024	1.933	2.011	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	1.881 ± 0.019	1.855	1.919	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_fibonacci	1.879 ± 0.012	1.866	1.901	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	6.688 ± 0.106	6.533	6.860	1.00
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	6.702 ± 0.086	6.562	6.776	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.006 ± 0.014	1.987	2.021	1.00 ± 0.01
head compare_arrays_200000	2.001 ± 0.016	1.981	2.038	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.335 ± 0.007	1.327	1.349	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.339 ± 0.007	1.330	1.349	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.132 ± 0.007	1.126	1.144	1.00
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.136 ± 0.010	1.122	1.155	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	6.760 ± 0.098	6.685	6.990	1.00
head integration_builtins	6.775 ± 0.093	6.693	6.950	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	6.834 ± 0.077	6.713	6.973	1.01 ± 0.02
head keccak_integration_benchmark	6.772 ± 0.070	6.707	6.896	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.012 ± 0.030	1.982	2.070	1.00 ± 0.02
head linear_search	2.007 ± 0.015	1.990	2.029	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.419 ± 0.008	1.406	1.431	1.00
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.430 ± 0.010	1.417	1.450	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.366 ± 0.009	1.354	1.377	1.00
head math_integration_benchmark	1.371 ± 0.006	1.365	1.382	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.128 ± 0.005	1.119	1.137	1.00
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.132 ± 0.009	1.121	1.148	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.449 ± 0.007	1.436	1.458	1.00
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.450 ± 0.011	1.436	1.472	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	507.9 ± 1.9	504.7	510.6	1.00
head pedersen	508.6 ± 2.3	505.5	513.1	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	590.3 ± 5.9	581.3	601.9	1.00
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	592.8 ± 7.9	584.1	613.1	1.00 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.733 ± 0.017	1.717	1.759	1.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.736 ± 0.017	1.722	1.776	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	607.1 ± 2.8	604.0	613.0	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	608.2 ± 2.5	604.9	611.7	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	3.823 ± 0.042	3.777	3.908	1.00
head uint256_integration_benchmark	3.855 ± 0.040	3.814	3.906	1.01 ± 0.02

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.97%. Comparing base (f6339d8) to head (0ccf709).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2202   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.97%   95.97%           
=======================================
  Files         104      104           
  Lines       36765    36765           
=======================================
  Hits        35286    35286           
  Misses       1479     1479           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[JulianGCalderon]

Looks good! Left a small comment

[JulianGCalderon]

LGTM!