Protocol Buffer support needs automation to keep it in sync.

[thecrazzymouse]

Describe the bug
The generated protobuf specification is inconsistent with the non protobuf classes.
The resources field is missing from the

V1.PodSpec.newBuilder()
   .addResource(...) //missing

class V1PodSpec{
    @SerializedName("resources")
    @Nullable
    private V1ResourceRequirements resources;
}

original golang specification

// +featureGate=PodLevelResources
	// +optional
	Resources *ResourceRequirements `json:"resources,omitempty" protobuf:"bytes,40,opt,name=resources"`

To Reproduce
Observe the generated protobuf code
https://github.com/kubernetes-client/java/raw/refs/tags/v25.0.0/proto/src/main/java/io/kubernetes/client/proto/V1.java

vs

https://github.com/kubernetes-client/java/blob/v25.0.0/kubernetes/src/main/java/io/kubernetes/client/openapi/models/V1PodSpec.java

Expected behavior
The resource shall be present in the protobuf variant too