rewrite pretty-print-with-dep-file to rmake

Author: Oneirical

src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt

@@ -134,7 +134,6 @@ run-make/pgo-indirect-call-promotion/Makefile
 run-make/pgo-use/Makefile
 run-make/pointer-auth-link-with-c/Makefile
 run-make/pretty-print-to-file/Makefile
-run-make/pretty-print-with-dep-file/Makefile
 run-make/print-calling-conventions/Makefile
 run-make/print-target-list/Makefile
 run-make/profile/Makefile

tests/run-make/pretty-print-with-dep-file/Makefile

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// Passing --emit=dep-info to the Rust compiler should create a .d file...
+// but it failed to do so in Rust 1.69.0 when combined with -Z unpretty=expanded
+// due to a bug. This test checks that -Z unpretty=expanded does not prevent the
+// generation of the dep-info file, and that its -Z unpretty=normal counterpart
+// does not get an unexpected dep-info file.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112898
+
+use run_make_support::{fs_wrapper, invalid_utf8_contains, rustc};
+use std::path::Path;
+
+fn main() {
+    rustc().emit("dep-info").arg("-Zunpretty=expanded").input("with-dep.rs").run();
+    invalid_utf8_contains("with-dep.d", "with-dep.rs");
+    fs_wrapper::remove_file("with-dep.d");
+    rustc().emit("dep-info").arg("-Zunpretty=normal").input("with-dep.rs").run();
+    assert!(!Path::new("with-dep.d").exists());
+}