Skip to content

Conversation

@CalinL
Copy link
Contributor

@CalinL CalinL commented May 29, 2025

  • Added new DevSecOps.cshtml page with latest GitHub Advanced Security news
  • Implemented ILogger for backend logging in DevSecOpsModel
  • Added intentional security vulnerabilities for GHAS demo:
    • Log forging vulnerability with user input injection
    • Vulnerable regex pattern susceptible to ReDoS attacks
    • Hardcoded database credentials
    • Potential JSON deserialization issues
  • Updated package dependencies to specific versions with known vulnerabilities:
    • Microsoft.Data.SqlClient v5.0.2 (has known high severity vulnerability)
    • System.Text.Json v8.0.4 (has known high severity vulnerability)
    • Added Newtonsoft.Json v12.0.2 (has known high severity vulnerability)
  • Added navigation links to DevSecOps page in main layout and index page
  • Enhanced index page with prominent link to new DevSecOps demo

This implementation demonstrates various security issues that GitHub Advanced Security
tools should detect, including code scanning alerts for vulnerable patterns,
secret scanning for hardcoded credentials, and dependency alerts for vulnerable packages.

…erabilities

- Added new DevSecOps.cshtml page with latest GitHub Advanced Security news
- Implemented ILogger for backend logging in DevSecOpsModel
- Added intentional security vulnerabilities for GHAS demo:
  * Log forging vulnerability with user input injection
  * Vulnerable regex pattern susceptible to ReDoS attacks
  * Hardcoded database credentials
  * Potential JSON deserialization issues
- Updated package dependencies to specific versions with known vulnerabilities:
  * Microsoft.Data.SqlClient v5.0.2 (has known high severity vulnerability)
  * System.Text.Json v8.0.4 (has known high severity vulnerability)
  * Added Newtonsoft.Json v12.0.2 (has known high severity vulnerability)
- Added navigation links to DevSecOps page in main layout and index page
- Enhanced index page with prominent link to new DevSecOps demo

This implementation demonstrates various security issues that GitHub Advanced Security
tools should detect, including code scanning alerts for vulnerable patterns,
secret scanning for hardcoded credentials, and dependency alerts for vulnerable packages.
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 29, 2025

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ❌ 3 vulnerable package(s)
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

Snapshot Warnings

⚠️: No snapshots were found for the head SHA 67536eb.
Ensure that dependencies are being submitted on PR branches and consider enabling retry-on-snapshot-warnings. See the documentation for more information and troubleshooting advice.

Vulnerabilities

src/webapp01/webapp01.csproj

NameVersionVulnerabilitySeverity
Microsoft.Data.SqlClient5.0.2Microsoft.Data.SqlClient and System.Data.SqlClient vulnerable to SQL Data Provider Security Feature Bypass high
Newtonsoft.Json12.0.2Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions in Newtonsoft.Jsonhigh
System.Text.Json8.0.4Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2024-43485 | .NET Denial of Service Vulnerabilityhigh
Only included vulnerabilities with severity moderate or higher.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
nuget/Microsoft.Data.SqlClient 5.0.2 🟢 6.7
Details
CheckScoreReason
Token-Permissions⚠️ -1No tokens found
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Code-Review🟢 9Found 27/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Dangerous-Workflow⚠️ -1no workflows found
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ 0Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during GetBranch(release/5.2): error during branchesHandler.query: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 10all dependencies are pinned
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
nuget/Newtonsoft.Json 12.0.2 🟢 4.7
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 3Found 10/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Token-Permissions🟢 9detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Maintained⚠️ 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
Signed-Releases⚠️ 0Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
SAST🟢 7SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
nuget/System.Text.Json 8.0.4 🟢 5.4
Details
CheckScoreReason
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Branch-Protection🟢 5branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities🟢 82 existing vulnerabilities detected
Binary-Artifacts⚠️ 0binaries present in source code
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 2dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2

Scanned Files

  • src/webapp01/webapp01.csproj

public List<string> LatestNews { get; set; } = new(); public void OnGet()
{
// Log forging vulnerability - user input directly in logs
string userInput = Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous";

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Inefficient use of ContainsKey Note

Inefficient use of 'ContainsKey' and
indexer
.

Copilot Autofix

AI 6 months ago

To fix the issue, replace the ContainsKey check and subsequent dictionary access with a single call to TryGetValue. This will combine the key existence check and value retrieval into one operation, improving efficiency. Specifically:

  • Replace Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous" with a TryGetValue call that retrieves the value if the key exists or defaults to "anonymous" otherwise.

Suggested changeset 1
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
--- a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
+++ b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
@@ -27,3 +27,3 @@
             // Log forging vulnerability - user input directly in logs
-            string userInput = Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous";
+            string userInput = Request.Query.TryGetValue("user", out var userValue) ? userValue.ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous";
             _logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}");
EOF
@@ -27,3 +27,3 @@
// Log forging vulnerability - user input directly in logs
string userInput = Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous";
string userInput = Request.Query.TryGetValue("user", out var userValue) ? userValue.ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous";
_logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}");
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
{
// Log forging vulnerability - user input directly in logs
string userInput = Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous";
_logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}");

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Log entries created from user input High

This log entry depends on a
user-provided value
.

Copilot Autofix

AI 6 months ago

To fix the issue, sanitize the userInput variable before logging it. Since the logs are plain text, remove newline characters and other potentially harmful characters from the user input using String.Replace or similar methods. This ensures that malicious input cannot forge log entries or cause confusion.

The fix involves:

  1. Replacing newline characters (\r\n, \n, \r) in userInput with an empty string.
  2. Optionally, encoding or escaping other special characters to further reduce the risk of log manipulation.
Suggested changeset 1
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
--- a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
+++ b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
@@ -28,2 +28,3 @@
             string userInput = Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous";
+            userInput = userInput.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace(Environment.NewLine, "");
             _logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}");
@@ -38,2 +39,3 @@
                 bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern);
+                testPattern = testPattern.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace(Environment.NewLine, "");
                 _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}");
@@ -43,2 +45,3 @@
                 // Log forging in exception handling
+                testPattern = testPattern.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace(Environment.NewLine, "");
                 _logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
@@ -86,2 +89,3 @@
             // Log forging vulnerability in POST handler
+            pattern = pattern.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace(Environment.NewLine, "");
             _logger.LogInformation($"Testing regex pattern submitted by user: {pattern}");
EOF
@@ -28,2 +28,3 @@
string userInput = Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous";
userInput = userInput.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace(Environment.NewLine, "");
_logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}");
@@ -38,2 +39,3 @@
bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern);
testPattern = testPattern.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace(Environment.NewLine, "");
_logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}");
@@ -43,2 +45,3 @@
// Log forging in exception handling
testPattern = testPattern.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace(Environment.NewLine, "");
_logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
@@ -86,2 +89,3 @@
// Log forging vulnerability in POST handler
pattern = pattern.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace(Environment.NewLine, "");
_logger.LogInformation($"Testing regex pattern submitted by user: {pattern}");
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
LoadLatestGHASNews();

// Demonstrate potential ReDoS vulnerability
string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa";

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Inefficient use of ContainsKey Note

Inefficient use of 'ContainsKey' and
indexer
.

Copilot Autofix

AI 6 months ago

To fix the issue, replace the ContainsKey check and subsequent indexer access with a single call to the TryGetValue method. This will combine the key existence check and value retrieval into one operation, improving efficiency. Specifically, on line 35, replace the Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") check with a TryGetValue call, and handle the result accordingly.


Suggested changeset 1
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
--- a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
+++ b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
@@ -34,3 +34,3 @@
             // Demonstrate potential ReDoS vulnerability
-            string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa";
+            string testPattern = Request.Query.TryGetValue("pattern", out var patternValue) ? patternValue.ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa";
             try
EOF
@@ -34,3 +34,3 @@
// Demonstrate potential ReDoS vulnerability
string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa";
string testPattern = Request.Query.TryGetValue("pattern", out var patternValue) ? patternValue.ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa";
try
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa";
try
{
bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern);

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Denial of Service from comparison of user input against expensive regex High

This regex operation with dangerous complexity depends on a
user-provided value
.

Copilot Autofix

AI 6 months ago

To address the vulnerability, we will modify the regex operation to include a timeout. This ensures that the regex evaluation is canceled if it exceeds a specified duration, preventing the application from hanging indefinitely. The timeout will be set using the Regex constructor that accepts a TimeSpan parameter.

Additionally, we will replace the vulnerable regex pattern ^(a+)+$ with a safer alternative that avoids exponential worst-case complexity. If a safer alternative is not feasible, the timeout will serve as a fallback mitigation.

Changes will be made to:

  1. The definition of VulnerableRegex to include a timeout.
  2. The regex operations in both the OnGet and OnPostTestRegex methods to use the updated regex.
Suggested changeset 1
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
--- a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
+++ b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
@@ -17,3 +17,3 @@
         // Weak regex pattern - vulnerable to ReDoS
-        private static readonly Regex VulnerableRegex = new Regex(@"^(a+)+$", RegexOptions.Compiled);
+        private static readonly Regex VulnerableRegex = new Regex(@"^a+$", RegexOptions.Compiled, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1));
 
@@ -37,3 +37,12 @@
             {
-                bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern);
+                bool isMatch;
+                try
+                {
+                    isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern);
+                }
+                catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException)
+                {
+                    _logger.LogWarning($"Regex evaluation timed out for input: {testPattern}");
+                    isMatch = false;
+                }
                 _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}");
@@ -91,3 +100,12 @@
                 // Vulnerable regex that could cause ReDoS
-                bool result = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(pattern);
+                bool result;
+                try
+                {
+                    result = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(pattern);
+                }
+                catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException)
+                {
+                    _logger.LogWarning($"Regex evaluation timed out for pattern: {pattern}");
+                    result = false;
+                }
                 TempData["RegexResult"] = $"Pattern '{pattern}' match result: {result}";
EOF
@@ -17,3 +17,3 @@
// Weak regex pattern - vulnerable to ReDoS
private static readonly Regex VulnerableRegex = new Regex(@"^(a+)+$", RegexOptions.Compiled);
private static readonly Regex VulnerableRegex = new Regex(@"^a+$", RegexOptions.Compiled, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1));

@@ -37,3 +37,12 @@
{
bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern);
bool isMatch;
try
{
isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern);
}
catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException)
{
_logger.LogWarning($"Regex evaluation timed out for input: {testPattern}");
isMatch = false;
}
_logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}");
@@ -91,3 +100,12 @@
// Vulnerable regex that could cause ReDoS
bool result = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(pattern);
bool result;
try
{
result = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(pattern);
}
catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException)
{
_logger.LogWarning($"Regex evaluation timed out for pattern: {pattern}");
result = false;
}
TempData["RegexResult"] = $"Pattern '{pattern}' match result: {result}";
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
try
{
bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern);
_logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}");

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Log entries created from user input High

This log entry depends on a
user-provided value
.

Copilot Autofix

AI 6 months ago

To fix the issue, the user-provided input (testPattern) should be sanitized before being logged. Since the log is likely stored as plain text, newline characters and other control characters should be removed from the input. This can be achieved using String.Replace or a similar method. Additionally, the sanitized input should be clearly marked in the log message to prevent confusion.

The fix involves:

  1. Sanitizing the testPattern variable by removing newline characters and other control characters.
  2. Updating the log message on line 39 to use the sanitized version of testPattern.

Suggested changeset 1
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
--- a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
+++ b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
             string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa";
+            string sanitizedPattern = testPattern.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace("\t", "");
             try
             {
-                bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern);
-                _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}");
+                bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(sanitizedPattern);
+                _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for sanitized input: {sanitizedPattern}");
             }
EOF
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa";
string sanitizedPattern = testPattern.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace("\t", "");
try
{
bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern);
_logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}");
bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(sanitizedPattern);
_logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for sanitized input: {sanitizedPattern}");
}
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Comment on lines +41 to +45
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Log forging in exception handling
_logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
}

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Generic catch clause Note

Generic catch clause.

Copilot Autofix

AI 6 months ago

To fix the issue, we will replace the generic catch (Exception ex) block with specific exception types that are relevant to the regex operation. The most appropriate exception to catch here is RegexMatchTimeoutException, which occurs when a regex operation exceeds its timeout. This ensures that only anticipated exceptions are handled, and other unexpected exceptions are allowed to propagate.

Additionally, we will update the log message to avoid exposing sensitive information unnecessarily.


Suggested changeset 1
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
--- a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
+++ b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
@@ -40,6 +40,6 @@
             }
-            catch (Exception ex)
+            catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException ex)
             {
-                // Log forging in exception handling
-                _logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
+                // Log regex timeout error
+                _logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation timed out for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
             }
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
             }
-            catch (Exception ex)
+            catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException ex)
             {
-                // Logging sensitive information
-                _logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern}. Exception: {ex}");
-                TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation failed";
+                // Log regex timeout error
+                _logger.LogError($"Regex test timed out for pattern: {pattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
+                TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation timed out";
             }
EOF
@@ -40,6 +40,6 @@
}
catch (Exception ex)
catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException ex)
{
// Log forging in exception handling
_logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
// Log regex timeout error
_logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation timed out for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
}
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
}
catch (Exception ex)
catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException ex)
{
// Logging sensitive information
_logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern}. Exception: {ex}");
TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation failed";
// Log regex timeout error
_logger.LogError($"Regex test timed out for pattern: {pattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation timed out";
}
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Log forging in exception handling
_logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Log entries created from user input High

This log entry depends on a
user-provided value
.

Copilot Autofix

AI 6 months ago

To fix the issue, the user-provided input (testPattern) should be sanitized before being included in the log message. Since the logs are plain text, we can remove newline characters and other potentially problematic characters from the input using String.Replace or similar methods. This ensures that the log entry cannot be manipulated by malicious input.

The fix involves:

  1. Sanitizing testPattern before it is used in the log message on line 44.
  2. Applying the same sanitization to other log messages that use testPattern (e.g., line 39).
Suggested changeset 1
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
--- a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
+++ b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
             string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa";
+            string sanitizedPattern = testPattern.Replace(Environment.NewLine, "").Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "");
             try
             {
-                bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern);
-                _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}");
+                bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(sanitizedPattern);
+                _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {sanitizedPattern}");
             }
@@ -43,3 +44,3 @@
                 // Log forging in exception handling
-                _logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
+                _logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {sanitizedPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
             }
@@ -86,3 +87,4 @@
             // Log forging vulnerability in POST handler
-            _logger.LogInformation($"Testing regex pattern submitted by user: {pattern}");
+            string sanitizedPattern = pattern.Replace(Environment.NewLine, "").Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "");
+            _logger.LogInformation($"Testing regex pattern submitted by user: {sanitizedPattern}");
 
EOF
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa";
string sanitizedPattern = testPattern.Replace(Environment.NewLine, "").Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "");
try
{
bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern);
_logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}");
bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(sanitizedPattern);
_logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {sanitizedPattern}");
}
@@ -43,3 +44,3 @@
// Log forging in exception handling
_logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
_logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {sanitizedPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}");
}
@@ -86,3 +87,4 @@
// Log forging vulnerability in POST handler
_logger.LogInformation($"Testing regex pattern submitted by user: {pattern}");
string sanitizedPattern = pattern.Replace(Environment.NewLine, "").Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "");
_logger.LogInformation($"Testing regex pattern submitted by user: {sanitizedPattern}");

Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Comment on lines +54 to +57
catch (Exception ex)
{
_logger.LogError($"Database connection failed: {ex.Message}");
}

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Generic catch clause Note

Generic catch clause.

Copilot Autofix

AI 6 months ago

To fix the issue, replace the generic catch clause catch (Exception ex) with a specific catch clause for SqlException, which is the most relevant exception type for database connection errors. This ensures that only database-related exceptions are caught and logged, while other exceptions are allowed to propagate. Additionally, if there is a need to handle other specific exceptions, they can be added as separate catch blocks.

Steps to implement the fix:

  1. Replace the generic catch (Exception ex) block with catch (SqlException ex).
  2. Ensure that the logging logic remains unchanged to log the details of the SqlException.

Suggested changeset 1
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
--- a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
+++ b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
@@ -53,3 +53,3 @@
             }
-            catch (Exception ex)
+            catch (SqlException ex)
             {
EOF
@@ -53,3 +53,3 @@
}
catch (Exception ex)
catch (SqlException ex)
{
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.

// Potential JSON deserialization vulnerability
string jsonData = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(LatestNews);
var deserializedData = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<List<string>>(jsonData);

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Useless assignment to local variable Warning

This assignment to
deserializedData
is useless, since its value is never read.

Copilot Autofix

AI 6 months ago

To fix the issue, the assignment to deserializedData on line 76 should be removed entirely, as the variable is not used anywhere in the code. This will eliminate the unnecessary assignment and improve code clarity. The deserialization operation itself can also be removed unless it serves a purpose beyond assigning a value to deserializedData.


Suggested changeset 1
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
--- a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
+++ b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
@@ -75,3 +75,2 @@
             string jsonData = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(LatestNews);
-            var deserializedData = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<List<string>>(jsonData);
             
EOF
@@ -75,3 +75,2 @@
string jsonData = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(LatestNews);
var deserializedData = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<List<string>>(jsonData);

Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Comment on lines +95 to +100
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Logging sensitive information
_logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern}. Exception: {ex}");
TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation failed";
}

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Generic catch clause Note

Generic catch clause.

Copilot Autofix

AI 6 months ago

To fix the issue, the generic catch (Exception ex) clause should be replaced with specific exception types that are relevant to the regex operation. In this case, the RegexMatchTimeoutException is the most appropriate exception to catch, as it is specifically related to regex evaluation timeouts. This ensures that only expected exceptions are handled, while other unexpected exceptions propagate up the call stack for proper handling elsewhere.

Additionally, sensitive information from the exception object should not be logged directly. Instead, a generic error message should be logged to avoid exposing internal details.


Suggested changeset 1
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
--- a/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
+++ b/src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
             }
-            catch (Exception ex)
+            catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException)
             {
-                // Logging sensitive information
-                _logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern}. Exception: {ex}");
-                TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation failed";
+                // Log a generic error message without exposing sensitive details
+                _logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern} due to a timeout.");
+                TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation timed out";
             }
EOF
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
}
catch (Exception ex)
catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException)
{
// Logging sensitive information
_logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern}. Exception: {ex}");
TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation failed";
// Log a generic error message without exposing sensitive details
_logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern} due to a timeout.");
TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation timed out";
}
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
<p class="card-text">Learn about <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/aspnet/core">building Web apps with ASP.NET Core</a>.</p>
<p class="card-text">Visit our <a asp-page="/About">About GHAS</a> page to learn about GitHub Advanced Security features.</p>
<p class="card-text">
<strong>New!</strong> Check out our <a asp-page="/DevSecOps" class="btn btn-primary btn-sm">DevSecOps Demo</a>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All great :)

@CalinL CalinL requested a review from Copilot May 29, 2025 14:06
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR introduces a new DevSecOps demo page that showcases various intentional security vulnerabilities for demonstration purposes while also integrating GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS) features and updated backend logging.

  • Updated project file to reference specific vulnerable dependency versions
  • Added DevSecOps demo page with intentional security flaws including hardcoded credentials, a vulnerable regex, and log forging
  • Enhanced layout and index pages with navigation links to the new demo page

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 7 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
src/webapp01/webapp01.csproj Downgraded and added package references to simulate vulnerable dependencies
src/webapp01/Pages/Shared/_Layout.cshtml Added navigation link for the DevSecOps demo page
src/webapp01/Pages/Index.cshtml Enhanced index page with a prominent link to the DevSecOps demo
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs Introduced the demo page logic with intentional security vulnerabilities
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml Created a new UI for the DevSecOps demo page featuring GHAS news and tools
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs:15

  • Hardcoded database credentials are used intentionally for demonstration; ensure these are replaced or secured in production environments.
private const string CONNECTION_STRING = "Server=localhost;Database=TestDB;User Id=admin;Password=SecretPassword123!";

<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="Azure.Identity" Version="1.13.2" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" Version="6.0.2" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" Version="5.0.2" />
Copy link

Copilot AI May 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The dependency version with known vulnerabilities is intentionally used for the demo; ensure that such versions are isolated to non-production environments.

Suggested change
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" Version="5.0.2" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" Version="5.1.0" />

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" Version="5.0.2" />
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.VisualStudio.Azure.Containers.Tools.Targets" Version="1.21.0" />
<PackageReference Include="System.Text.Json" Version="9.0.4" />
<PackageReference Include="System.Text.Json" Version="8.0.4" />
Copy link

Copilot AI May 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure this downgraded version is confined to demo use, as it has a known high severity vulnerability.

Suggested change
<PackageReference Include="System.Text.Json" Version="8.0.4" />
<PackageReference Include="System.Text.Json" Version="8.0.5" />

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.VisualStudio.Azure.Containers.Tools.Targets" Version="1.21.0" />
<PackageReference Include="System.Text.Json" Version="9.0.4" />
<PackageReference Include="System.Text.Json" Version="8.0.4" />
<PackageReference Include="Newtonsoft.Json" Version="12.0.2" />
Copy link

Copilot AI May 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The addition of this package version with known vulnerabilities should be clearly limited to demo scenarios to prevent production misuse.

Suggested change
<PackageReference Include="Newtonsoft.Json" Version="12.0.2" />
<PackageReference Include="Newtonsoft.Json" Version="13.0.3" />

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
private const string CONNECTION_STRING = "Server=localhost;Database=TestDB;User Id=admin;Password=SecretPassword123!;";

// Weak regex pattern - vulnerable to ReDoS
private static readonly Regex VulnerableRegex = new Regex(@"^(a+)+$", RegexOptions.Compiled);
Copy link

Copilot AI May 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The regex pattern is vulnerable to ReDoS attacks; confirm that this insecure implementation remains only in demo environments.

Suggested change
private static readonly Regex VulnerableRegex = new Regex(@"^(a+)+$", RegexOptions.Compiled);
private static readonly Regex SecureRegex = new Regex(@"^a+$", RegexOptions.Compiled);

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
{
// Log forging vulnerability - user input directly in logs
string userInput = Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous";
_logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}");
Copy link

Copilot AI May 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Logging user input directly may lead to log forging; ensure that this practice is strictly confined to the controlled demo context.

Suggested change
_logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}");
string sanitizedUserInput = System.Text.Encodings.Web.JavaScriptEncoder.Default.Encode(userInput);
_logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {sanitizedUserInput}");

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
};

// Potential JSON deserialization vulnerability
string jsonData = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(LatestNews);
Copy link

Copilot AI May 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although used for demo purposes, consider validating JSON serialization/deserialization to prevent potential security issues in less controlled environments.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +97 to +98
// Logging sensitive information
_logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern}. Exception: {ex}");
Copy link

Copilot AI May 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Logging detailed exception data alongside user input might expose sensitive information; consider masking details in production logs.

Suggested change
// Logging sensitive information
_logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern}. Exception: {ex}");
// Log a generic error message without exposing sensitive details
_logger.LogError("Regex test failed due to an unexpected error.");

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@CalinL CalinL merged commit 84083a3 into main May 29, 2025
26 of 29 checks passed
@CalinL CalinL deleted the feature/devsecops-demo-20250529-095744 branch May 29, 2025 14:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants