-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
feat: Add DevSecOps demo page with GHAS features and intentional vulnerabilities #74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…erabilities - Added new DevSecOps.cshtml page with latest GitHub Advanced Security news - Implemented ILogger for backend logging in DevSecOpsModel - Added intentional security vulnerabilities for GHAS demo: * Log forging vulnerability with user input injection * Vulnerable regex pattern susceptible to ReDoS attacks * Hardcoded database credentials * Potential JSON deserialization issues - Updated package dependencies to specific versions with known vulnerabilities: * Microsoft.Data.SqlClient v5.0.2 (has known high severity vulnerability) * System.Text.Json v8.0.4 (has known high severity vulnerability) * Added Newtonsoft.Json v12.0.2 (has known high severity vulnerability) - Added navigation links to DevSecOps page in main layout and index page - Enhanced index page with prominent link to new DevSecOps demo This implementation demonstrates various security issues that GitHub Advanced Security tools should detect, including code scanning alerts for vulnerable patterns, secret scanning for hardcoded credentials, and dependency alerts for vulnerable packages.
Dependency ReviewThe following issues were found:
Snapshot WarningsEnsure that dependencies are being submitted on PR branches and consider enabling retry-on-snapshot-warnings. See the documentation for more information and troubleshooting advice. Vulnerabilitiessrc/webapp01/webapp01.csprojOnly included vulnerabilities with severity moderate or higher. OpenSSF Scorecard
Scanned Files
|
| public List<string> LatestNews { get; set; } = new(); public void OnGet() | ||
| { | ||
| // Log forging vulnerability - user input directly in logs | ||
| string userInput = Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous"; |
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Inefficient use of ContainsKey Note
indexer
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 6 months ago
To fix the issue, replace the ContainsKey check and subsequent dictionary access with a single call to TryGetValue. This will combine the key existence check and value retrieval into one operation, improving efficiency. Specifically:
- Replace
Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous"with aTryGetValuecall that retrieves the value if the key exists or defaults to "anonymous" otherwise.
-
Copy modified line R28
| @@ -27,3 +27,3 @@ | ||
| // Log forging vulnerability - user input directly in logs | ||
| string userInput = Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous"; | ||
| string userInput = Request.Query.TryGetValue("user", out var userValue) ? userValue.ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous"; | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}"); |
| { | ||
| // Log forging vulnerability - user input directly in logs | ||
| string userInput = Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous"; | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}"); |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Log entries created from user input High
user-provided value
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 6 months ago
To fix the issue, sanitize the userInput variable before logging it. Since the logs are plain text, remove newline characters and other potentially harmful characters from the user input using String.Replace or similar methods. This ensures that malicious input cannot forge log entries or cause confusion.
The fix involves:
- Replacing newline characters (
\r\n,\n,\r) inuserInputwith an empty string. - Optionally, encoding or escaping other special characters to further reduce the risk of log manipulation.
-
Copy modified line R29 -
Copy modified line R40 -
Copy modified line R46 -
Copy modified line R90
| @@ -28,2 +28,3 @@ | ||
| string userInput = Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous"; | ||
| userInput = userInput.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace(Environment.NewLine, ""); | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}"); | ||
| @@ -38,2 +39,3 @@ | ||
| bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern); | ||
| testPattern = testPattern.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace(Environment.NewLine, ""); | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}"); | ||
| @@ -43,2 +45,3 @@ | ||
| // Log forging in exception handling | ||
| testPattern = testPattern.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace(Environment.NewLine, ""); | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}"); | ||
| @@ -86,2 +89,3 @@ | ||
| // Log forging vulnerability in POST handler | ||
| pattern = pattern.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace(Environment.NewLine, ""); | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"Testing regex pattern submitted by user: {pattern}"); |
| LoadLatestGHASNews(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Demonstrate potential ReDoS vulnerability | ||
| string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa"; |
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Inefficient use of ContainsKey Note
indexer
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 6 months ago
To fix the issue, replace the ContainsKey check and subsequent indexer access with a single call to the TryGetValue method. This will combine the key existence check and value retrieval into one operation, improving efficiency. Specifically, on line 35, replace the Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") check with a TryGetValue call, and handle the result accordingly.
-
Copy modified line R35
| @@ -34,3 +34,3 @@ | ||
| // Demonstrate potential ReDoS vulnerability | ||
| string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa"; | ||
| string testPattern = Request.Query.TryGetValue("pattern", out var patternValue) ? patternValue.ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa"; | ||
| try |
| string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa"; | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern); |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Denial of Service from comparison of user input against expensive regex High
user-provided value
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 6 months ago
To address the vulnerability, we will modify the regex operation to include a timeout. This ensures that the regex evaluation is canceled if it exceeds a specified duration, preventing the application from hanging indefinitely. The timeout will be set using the Regex constructor that accepts a TimeSpan parameter.
Additionally, we will replace the vulnerable regex pattern ^(a+)+$ with a safer alternative that avoids exponential worst-case complexity. If a safer alternative is not feasible, the timeout will serve as a fallback mitigation.
Changes will be made to:
- The definition of
VulnerableRegexto include a timeout. - The regex operations in both the
OnGetandOnPostTestRegexmethods to use the updated regex.
-
Copy modified line R18 -
Copy modified lines R38-R47 -
Copy modified lines R101-R110
| @@ -17,3 +17,3 @@ | ||
| // Weak regex pattern - vulnerable to ReDoS | ||
| private static readonly Regex VulnerableRegex = new Regex(@"^(a+)+$", RegexOptions.Compiled); | ||
| private static readonly Regex VulnerableRegex = new Regex(@"^a+$", RegexOptions.Compiled, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1)); | ||
|
|
||
| @@ -37,3 +37,12 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern); | ||
| bool isMatch; | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern); | ||
| } | ||
| catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException) | ||
| { | ||
| _logger.LogWarning($"Regex evaluation timed out for input: {testPattern}"); | ||
| isMatch = false; | ||
| } | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}"); | ||
| @@ -91,3 +100,12 @@ | ||
| // Vulnerable regex that could cause ReDoS | ||
| bool result = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(pattern); | ||
| bool result; | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| result = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(pattern); | ||
| } | ||
| catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException) | ||
| { | ||
| _logger.LogWarning($"Regex evaluation timed out for pattern: {pattern}"); | ||
| result = false; | ||
| } | ||
| TempData["RegexResult"] = $"Pattern '{pattern}' match result: {result}"; |
| try | ||
| { | ||
| bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern); | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}"); |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Log entries created from user input High
user-provided value
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 6 months ago
To fix the issue, the user-provided input (testPattern) should be sanitized before being logged. Since the log is likely stored as plain text, newline characters and other control characters should be removed from the input. This can be achieved using String.Replace or a similar method. Additionally, the sanitized input should be clearly marked in the log message to prevent confusion.
The fix involves:
- Sanitizing the
testPatternvariable by removing newline characters and other control characters. - Updating the log message on line 39 to use the sanitized version of
testPattern.
-
Copy modified line R36 -
Copy modified lines R39-R40
| @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ | ||
| string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa"; | ||
| string sanitizedPattern = testPattern.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", "").Replace("\t", ""); | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern); | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}"); | ||
| bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(sanitizedPattern); | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for sanitized input: {sanitizedPattern}"); | ||
| } |
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| // Log forging in exception handling | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}"); | ||
| } |
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Generic catch clause Note
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 6 months ago
To fix the issue, we will replace the generic catch (Exception ex) block with specific exception types that are relevant to the regex operation. The most appropriate exception to catch here is RegexMatchTimeoutException, which occurs when a regex operation exceeds its timeout. This ensures that only anticipated exceptions are handled, and other unexpected exceptions are allowed to propagate.
Additionally, we will update the log message to avoid exposing sensitive information unnecessarily.
-
Copy modified line R41 -
Copy modified lines R43-R44 -
Copy modified line R95 -
Copy modified lines R97-R99
| @@ -40,6 +40,6 @@ | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException ex) | ||
| { | ||
| // Log forging in exception handling | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}"); | ||
| // Log regex timeout error | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation timed out for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}"); | ||
| } | ||
| @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException ex) | ||
| { | ||
| // Logging sensitive information | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern}. Exception: {ex}"); | ||
| TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation failed"; | ||
| // Log regex timeout error | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex test timed out for pattern: {pattern}. Error: {ex.Message}"); | ||
| TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation timed out"; | ||
| } |
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| // Log forging in exception handling | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}"); |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Log entries created from user input High
user-provided value
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 6 months ago
To fix the issue, the user-provided input (testPattern) should be sanitized before being included in the log message. Since the logs are plain text, we can remove newline characters and other potentially problematic characters from the input using String.Replace or similar methods. This ensures that the log entry cannot be manipulated by malicious input.
The fix involves:
- Sanitizing
testPatternbefore it is used in the log message on line 44. - Applying the same sanitization to other log messages that use
testPattern(e.g., line 39).
-
Copy modified line R36 -
Copy modified lines R39-R40 -
Copy modified line R45 -
Copy modified lines R88-R89
| @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ | ||
| string testPattern = Request.Query.ContainsKey("pattern") ? Request.Query["pattern"].ToString() ?? "aaa" : "aaa"; | ||
| string sanitizedPattern = testPattern.Replace(Environment.NewLine, "").Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", ""); | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(testPattern); | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {testPattern}"); | ||
| bool isMatch = VulnerableRegex.IsMatch(sanitizedPattern); | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"Regex pattern match result: {isMatch} for input: {sanitizedPattern}"); | ||
| } | ||
| @@ -43,3 +44,3 @@ | ||
| // Log forging in exception handling | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {testPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}"); | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex evaluation failed for pattern: {sanitizedPattern}. Error: {ex.Message}"); | ||
| } | ||
| @@ -86,3 +87,4 @@ | ||
| // Log forging vulnerability in POST handler | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"Testing regex pattern submitted by user: {pattern}"); | ||
| string sanitizedPattern = pattern.Replace(Environment.NewLine, "").Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", ""); | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"Testing regex pattern submitted by user: {sanitizedPattern}"); | ||
|
|
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Database connection failed: {ex.Message}"); | ||
| } |
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Generic catch clause Note
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 6 months ago
To fix the issue, replace the generic catch clause catch (Exception ex) with a specific catch clause for SqlException, which is the most relevant exception type for database connection errors. This ensures that only database-related exceptions are caught and logged, while other exceptions are allowed to propagate. Additionally, if there is a need to handle other specific exceptions, they can be added as separate catch blocks.
Steps to implement the fix:
- Replace the generic
catch (Exception ex)block withcatch (SqlException ex). - Ensure that the logging logic remains unchanged to log the details of the
SqlException.
-
Copy modified line R54
| @@ -53,3 +53,3 @@ | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| catch (SqlException ex) | ||
| { |
|
|
||
| // Potential JSON deserialization vulnerability | ||
| string jsonData = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(LatestNews); | ||
| var deserializedData = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<List<string>>(jsonData); |
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Useless assignment to local variable Warning
deserializedData
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 6 months ago
To fix the issue, the assignment to deserializedData on line 76 should be removed entirely, as the variable is not used anywhere in the code. This will eliminate the unnecessary assignment and improve code clarity. The deserialization operation itself can also be removed unless it serves a purpose beyond assigning a value to deserializedData.
| @@ -75,3 +75,2 @@ | ||
| string jsonData = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(LatestNews); | ||
| var deserializedData = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<List<string>>(jsonData); | ||
|
|
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| // Logging sensitive information | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern}. Exception: {ex}"); | ||
| TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation failed"; | ||
| } |
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Generic catch clause Note
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix
AI 6 months ago
To fix the issue, the generic catch (Exception ex) clause should be replaced with specific exception types that are relevant to the regex operation. In this case, the RegexMatchTimeoutException is the most appropriate exception to catch, as it is specifically related to regex evaluation timeouts. This ensures that only expected exceptions are handled, while other unexpected exceptions propagate up the call stack for proper handling elsewhere.
Additionally, sensitive information from the exception object should not be logged directly. Instead, a generic error message should be logged to avoid exposing internal details.
-
Copy modified line R95 -
Copy modified lines R97-R99
| @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException) | ||
| { | ||
| // Logging sensitive information | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern}. Exception: {ex}"); | ||
| TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation failed"; | ||
| // Log a generic error message without exposing sensitive details | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern} due to a timeout."); | ||
| TempData["RegexError"] = "Pattern evaluation timed out"; | ||
| } |
| <p class="card-text">Learn about <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/aspnet/core">building Web apps with ASP.NET Core</a>.</p> | ||
| <p class="card-text">Visit our <a asp-page="/About">About GHAS</a> page to learn about GitHub Advanced Security features.</p> | ||
| <p class="card-text"> | ||
| <strong>New!</strong> Check out our <a asp-page="/DevSecOps" class="btn btn-primary btn-sm">DevSecOps Demo</a> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All great :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR introduces a new DevSecOps demo page that showcases various intentional security vulnerabilities for demonstration purposes while also integrating GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS) features and updated backend logging.
- Updated project file to reference specific vulnerable dependency versions
- Added DevSecOps demo page with intentional security flaws including hardcoded credentials, a vulnerable regex, and log forging
- Enhanced layout and index pages with navigation links to the new demo page
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 7 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/webapp01/webapp01.csproj | Downgraded and added package references to simulate vulnerable dependencies |
| src/webapp01/Pages/Shared/_Layout.cshtml | Added navigation link for the DevSecOps demo page |
| src/webapp01/Pages/Index.cshtml | Enhanced index page with a prominent link to the DevSecOps demo |
| src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs | Introduced the demo page logic with intentional security vulnerabilities |
| src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml | Created a new UI for the DevSecOps demo page featuring GHAS news and tools |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs:15
- Hardcoded database credentials are used intentionally for demonstration; ensure these are replaced or secured in production environments.
private const string CONNECTION_STRING = "Server=localhost;Database=TestDB;User Id=admin;Password=SecretPassword123!";
| <ItemGroup> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Azure.Identity" Version="1.13.2" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" Version="6.0.2" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" Version="5.0.2" /> |
Copilot
AI
May 29, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The dependency version with known vulnerabilities is intentionally used for the demo; ensure that such versions are isolated to non-production environments.
| <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" Version="5.0.2" /> | |
| <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" Version="5.1.0" /> |
| <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.SqlClient" Version="5.0.2" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.VisualStudio.Azure.Containers.Tools.Targets" Version="1.21.0" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="System.Text.Json" Version="9.0.4" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="System.Text.Json" Version="8.0.4" /> |
Copilot
AI
May 29, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure this downgraded version is confined to demo use, as it has a known high severity vulnerability.
| <PackageReference Include="System.Text.Json" Version="8.0.4" /> | |
| <PackageReference Include="System.Text.Json" Version="8.0.5" /> |
| <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.VisualStudio.Azure.Containers.Tools.Targets" Version="1.21.0" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="System.Text.Json" Version="9.0.4" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="System.Text.Json" Version="8.0.4" /> | ||
| <PackageReference Include="Newtonsoft.Json" Version="12.0.2" /> |
Copilot
AI
May 29, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The addition of this package version with known vulnerabilities should be clearly limited to demo scenarios to prevent production misuse.
| <PackageReference Include="Newtonsoft.Json" Version="12.0.2" /> | |
| <PackageReference Include="Newtonsoft.Json" Version="13.0.3" /> |
| private const string CONNECTION_STRING = "Server=localhost;Database=TestDB;User Id=admin;Password=SecretPassword123!;"; | ||
|
|
||
| // Weak regex pattern - vulnerable to ReDoS | ||
| private static readonly Regex VulnerableRegex = new Regex(@"^(a+)+$", RegexOptions.Compiled); |
Copilot
AI
May 29, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The regex pattern is vulnerable to ReDoS attacks; confirm that this insecure implementation remains only in demo environments.
| private static readonly Regex VulnerableRegex = new Regex(@"^(a+)+$", RegexOptions.Compiled); | |
| private static readonly Regex SecureRegex = new Regex(@"^a+$", RegexOptions.Compiled); |
| { | ||
| // Log forging vulnerability - user input directly in logs | ||
| string userInput = Request.Query.ContainsKey("user") ? Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous" : "anonymous"; | ||
| _logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}"); |
Copilot
AI
May 29, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Logging user input directly may lead to log forging; ensure that this practice is strictly confined to the controlled demo context.
| _logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}"); | |
| string sanitizedUserInput = System.Text.Encodings.Web.JavaScriptEncoder.Default.Encode(userInput); | |
| _logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {sanitizedUserInput}"); |
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| // Potential JSON deserialization vulnerability | ||
| string jsonData = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(LatestNews); |
Copilot
AI
May 29, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although used for demo purposes, consider validating JSON serialization/deserialization to prevent potential security issues in less controlled environments.
| // Logging sensitive information | ||
| _logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern}. Exception: {ex}"); |
Copilot
AI
May 29, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Logging detailed exception data alongside user input might expose sensitive information; consider masking details in production logs.
| // Logging sensitive information | |
| _logger.LogError($"Regex test failed for pattern: {pattern}. Exception: {ex}"); | |
| // Log a generic error message without exposing sensitive details | |
| _logger.LogError("Regex test failed due to an unexpected error."); |
This implementation demonstrates various security issues that GitHub Advanced Security
tools should detect, including code scanning alerts for vulnerable patterns,
secret scanning for hardcoded credentials, and dependency alerts for vulnerable packages.