Address incorrect format code elements in alert message

Author: rvermeulen

c/misra/src/rules/RULE-6-1/BitFieldsShallOnlyBeDeclaredWithAnAppropriateType.ql

@@ -41,4 +41,4 @@ where
   /* A violation would neither be an appropriate primitive type nor an appropriate typedef. */
   not getSupportedBitFieldType(getCompiler(bitField.getFile())) =
     bitField.getType().resolveTypedefs()
-select bitField, "Bit-field " + bitField + " is declared on type " + bitField.getType() + "."
+select bitField, "Bit-field '" + bitField + "' is declared on type '" + bitField.getType() + "'."

c/misra/test/rules/RULE-6-1/BitFieldsShallOnlyBeDeclaredWithAnAppropriateType.expected

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-| test.c:6:7:6:8 | x1 | Bit-field x1 is declared on type int. |
-| test.c:10:15:10:16 | x5 | Bit-field x5 is declared on type signed long. |
-| test.c:12:15:12:16 | x6 | Bit-field x6 is declared on type signed char. |
-| test.c:14:14:14:15 | x7 | Bit-field x7 is declared on type Color. |
+| test.c:6:7:6:8 | x1 | Bit-field 'x1' is declared on type 'int'. |
+| test.c:10:15:10:16 | x5 | Bit-field 'x5' is declared on type 'signed long'. |
+| test.c:12:15:12:16 | x6 | Bit-field 'x6' is declared on type 'signed char'. |
+| test.c:14:14:14:15 | x7 | Bit-field 'x7' is declared on type 'Color'. |