Add basic POC Generation Command to MCP Server t #109
Conversation
…ge in security extension
QuinnDACollins
requested review from
QuanZhang-William,
capachino,
evanotero,
heltonduarte,
pedrour and
shrishabh
as code owners
|
🤖 Hi @QuinnDACollins, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details. |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📋 Review Summary
This Pull Request introduces a new feature for Proof-of-Concept (PoC) generation and vulnerability whitelisting. The changes include new server tools, prompts, and a poc.ts module with corresponding tests. The overall structure and test coverage are good, and the documentation for whitelisting vulnerabilities is a welcome addition.
🔍 General Feedback
- The prompt for the
note-adderis well-designed, ensuring consistency in note file formats. - The
validatePocParamsfunction provides essential input validation for PoC generation. - Unit tests for
poc.tsare comprehensive for the basic functionality, covering both valid and error scenarios.
| 1. **Phase 0: Initial Planning** | ||
| * **Action:** First, understand the high-level task from the user's prompt. | ||
| * **Action:** If it does not already exist, create a new folder named `.gemini_security` in the user's workspace. | ||
| * **Action:** Create a new file named `SECURITY_ANALYSIS_TODO.md` in `.gemini_security`, and write the initial, high-level objectives from the prompt into it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟢 Low There's a typo in the action description: "Action" should be "Action:".
| * **Action:** Create a new file named `SECURITY_ANALYSIS_TODO.md` in `.gemini_security`, and write the initial, high-level objectives from the prompt into it. | |
| * **Action:** Prep yourself using the following possible notes files under `.gemini_security/`. If they do not exist, skip them. |
| * **Action:** If it does not already exist, create a new folder named `.gemini_security` in the user's workspace. | ||
| * **Action:** Create a new file named `SECURITY_ANALYSIS_TODO.md` in `.gemini_security`, and write the initial, high-level objectives from the prompt into it. | ||
| * **Action:** Create a new, empty file named `DRAFT_SECURITY_REPORT.md` in `.gemini_security`. | ||
| * **Action"** Prep yourself using the following possible notes files under `.gemini_security/`. If they do not exist, skip them. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 Medium Inconsistency in file naming: the documentation (GEMINI.md) refers to vuln_whitelist.txt, while this TOML file refers to vuln_allowlist.txt. Please standardize on one name for clarity and consistency.
| * **Action"** Prep yourself using the following possible notes files under `.gemini_security/`. If they do not exist, skip them. | |
| * `vuln_whitelist.txt`: The allowlist file has vulnerabilities to ignore during your scan. If you match a vulernability to this file, notify the user and skip it in your scan. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The pull request adds a proof-of-concept generation command to the MCP server. The implementation introduces a critical command injection vulnerability that needs to be addressed.
🔍 General Feedback
- The code is well-structured and easy to understand.
- The addition of tests for the new functionality is a good practice.
3 participants
This PR adds a basic poc generation command to the mcp server and the relevant tooling to validate and run the poc.