@@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ We distribute a statically linked Raylib library, install from Pypi.
1212
1313 pip3 install raylib
1414
15- If you're using ** Linux** a different version of Python, or maybe a different version of Windows/Mac with incompatible libraries
16- then you can either use the dynamic binding only or else you will have to build from source using Raylib 2.5, e.g.
15+ If you're using ** Linux** , or a different version of Python, or maybe Windows/Mac with incompatible libraries
16+ then you can either * use the dynamic binding only* or else you will have to build from source. Download, compile
17+ and install Raylib 2.5 then
1718
1819 cd raylib/static
1920 python3 build_linux.py
@@ -22,7 +23,7 @@ then you can either use the dynamic binding only or else you will have to build
2223
2324## raylib.static
2425
25- Currently the goal is make usage as similar to the original C as CFFI will allow. There are a few differences
26+ Goal is make usage as similar to the original C as CFFI will allow. There are a few differences
2627you can see in the examples. See test_static.py and examples/* .py for how to use.
2728
2829```
@@ -50,9 +51,10 @@ In addition to the API static bindings we have CFFI ABI dynamic bindings in orde
5051There have been some weird failures with dynamic bindings and ctypes bindings before and often the failures are silent
5152so you dont even know. Also the static bindings should be faster. Therefore I recommend the static ones...
5253
53- BUT the dynamic bindings have the big advantage that you don't need to compile anything to install.
54+ BUT the dynamic bindings have the big advantage that you don't need to compile anything to install. You just need a Raylib DLL,
55+ which we supply for Windows/Mac/Linux.
5456
55- See test_dynamic.py for how to use them .
57+ See test_dynamic.py for how to use.
5658
5759## raylib.static.pyray
5860
0 commit comments