You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
for Terms aggregation
- the flags property is no longer supported and a regular expression pattern is sent as a string value against the "include" key
- exact values are sent as an array of strings
for Significant Terms aggregation
- a dictionary was incorrectly used to filter terms. Introduce a SignificantTermsIncludeExclude type to represent the available options. Don't reuse the TermsIncludeExclude type because it includes properties that are not applicable for filtering on Significant Terms aggregation.
Add unit and integration tests for include and exclude filtering
Fixes#2682Fixes#2676
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/aggregations/bucket/significant-terms/significant-terms-aggregation-usage.asciidoc
+162Lines changed: 162 additions & 0 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -15,6 +15,18 @@ please modify the original csharp file found at the link and submit the PR with
15
15
[[significant-terms-aggregation-usage]]
16
16
== Significant Terms Aggregation Usage
17
17
18
+
An aggregation that returns interesting or unusual occurrences of terms in a set.
19
+
20
+
[WARNING]
21
+
--
22
+
The significant_terms aggregation can be very heavy when run on large indices. Work is in progress
23
+
to provide more lightweight sampling techniques.
24
+
As a result, the API for this feature may change in non-backwards compatible ways
25
+
26
+
--
27
+
28
+
See the Elasticsearch documentation on {ref_current}/search-aggregations-bucket-significantterms-aggregation.html[significant terms aggregation] for more detail.
0 commit comments