@@ -808,12 +808,12 @@ $(GNAME StaticConstructor):
808808 $(P Static constructors are used to initialize static class members with
809809 values that cannot be computed at compile time.)
810810
811- $(P Static constructors in other languages are built implicitly by using
811+ $(PANEL
812+ Static constructors in other languages are built implicitly by using
812813 member
813814 initializers that can't be computed at compile time. The trouble with
814815 this stems from not
815816 having good control over exactly when the code is executed, for example:
816- )
817817
818818------
819819class Foo
@@ -823,9 +823,9 @@ class Foo
823823}
824824------
825825
826- What values do a and b end up with, what order are the initializations
826+ What values do `a` and `b` end up with, what order are the initializations
827827 executed in, what
828- are the values of a and b before the initializations are run, is this a
828+ are the values of `a` and `b` before the initializations are run, is this a
829829 compile error, or is this
830830 a runtime error? Additional confusion comes from it not being obvious if
831831 an initializer is
@@ -854,6 +854,7 @@ class Foo
854854 }
855855}
856856------
857+ )
857858
858859$(P If $(D main()) or the thread returns normally, (does not throw an
859860exception), the static destructor is added to the list of functions to be called
@@ -878,7 +879,7 @@ $(P Static constructors have empty parameter lists.)
878879class Foo
879880{
880881 static this() { ... } // a static constructor
881- static private this() { ... } // not a static constructor
882+ static private this() { ... } // Error: not a static constructor
882883 static
883884 {
884885 this() { ... } // not a static constructor
@@ -925,7 +926,7 @@ class Foo
925926class Foo
926927{
927928 static ~this() { ... } // a static destructor
928- static private ~this() { ... } // not a static destructor
929+ static private ~this() { ... } // Error: not a static destructor
929930 static
930931 {
931932 ~this() { ... } // not a static destructor
0 commit comments