cpufreq/sched: Set need_freq_update in ignore_dl_rate_limit()

JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-92921

commit 75da043
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Date:   Tue Apr 15 12:00:52 2025 +0200

    cpufreq/sched: Set need_freq_update in ignore_dl_rate_limit()

    Notice that ignore_dl_rate_limit() need not piggy back on the
    limits_changed handling to achieve its goal (which is to enforce a
    frequency update before its due time).

    Namely, if sugov_should_update_freq() is updated to check
    sg_policy->need_freq_update and return 'true' if it is set when
    sg_policy->limits_changed is not set, ignore_dl_rate_limit() may
    set the former directly instead of setting the latter, so it can
    avoid hitting the memory barrier in sugov_should_update_freq().

    Update the code accordingly.

    Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
    Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
    Link: https://patch.msgid.link/10666429.nUPlyArG6x@rjwysocki.net

Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>

Author: auldp

kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c

@@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ static bool sugov_should_update_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time)
 		 */
 		smp_mb();
 
+		return true;
+	} else if (sg_policy->need_freq_update) {
+		/* ignore_dl_rate_limit() wants a new frequency to be found. */
 		return true;
 	}
 
@@ -388,7 +391,7 @@ static inline bool sugov_hold_freq(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu) { return false; }
 static inline void ignore_dl_rate_limit(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
 {
 	if (cpu_bw_dl(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu)) > sg_cpu->bw_min)
-		WRITE_ONCE(sg_cpu->sg_policy->limits_changed, true);
+		sg_cpu->sg_policy->need_freq_update = true;
 }
 
 static inline bool sugov_update_single_common(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu,