Skip to content

Commit a8e6657

Browse files
committed
ext4: verify s_clusters_per_group even without bigalloc
JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-36282 Tested: with xfstests Currently we ignore s_clusters_per_group field in the on-disk superblock if bigalloc feature is not enabled. However e2fsprogs don't even open the filesystem if s_clusters_per_group is invalid. This results in an odd state where kernel happily works with the filesystem while even e2fsck refuses to touch it. Verify that s_clusters_per_group is valid even if bigalloc feature is not enabled to make things consistent. Due to current e2fsprogs behavior it is unlikely there are filesystems out in the wild (except for intentionally fuzzed ones) with invalid s_clusters_per_group counts. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240219171033.22882-1-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> (cherry picked from commit 40da553) Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
1 parent 8ad9ebe commit a8e6657

File tree

1 file changed

+13
-17
lines changed

1 file changed

+13
-17
lines changed

fs/ext4/super.c

Lines changed: 13 additions & 17 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4410,22 +4410,6 @@ static int ext4_handle_clustersize(struct super_block *sb)
44104410
}
44114411
sbi->s_cluster_bits = le32_to_cpu(es->s_log_cluster_size) -
44124412
le32_to_cpu(es->s_log_block_size);
4413-
sbi->s_clusters_per_group =
4414-
le32_to_cpu(es->s_clusters_per_group);
4415-
if (sbi->s_clusters_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8) {
4416-
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
4417-
"#clusters per group too big: %lu",
4418-
sbi->s_clusters_per_group);
4419-
return -EINVAL;
4420-
}
4421-
if (sbi->s_blocks_per_group !=
4422-
(sbi->s_clusters_per_group * (clustersize / sb->s_blocksize))) {
4423-
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "blocks per group (%lu) and "
4424-
"clusters per group (%lu) inconsistent",
4425-
sbi->s_blocks_per_group,
4426-
sbi->s_clusters_per_group);
4427-
return -EINVAL;
4428-
}
44294413
} else {
44304414
if (clustersize != sb->s_blocksize) {
44314415
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
@@ -4439,9 +4423,21 @@ static int ext4_handle_clustersize(struct super_block *sb)
44394423
sbi->s_blocks_per_group);
44404424
return -EINVAL;
44414425
}
4442-
sbi->s_clusters_per_group = sbi->s_blocks_per_group;
44434426
sbi->s_cluster_bits = 0;
44444427
}
4428+
sbi->s_clusters_per_group = le32_to_cpu(es->s_clusters_per_group);
4429+
if (sbi->s_clusters_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8) {
4430+
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "#clusters per group too big: %lu",
4431+
sbi->s_clusters_per_group);
4432+
return -EINVAL;
4433+
}
4434+
if (sbi->s_blocks_per_group !=
4435+
(sbi->s_clusters_per_group * (clustersize / sb->s_blocksize))) {
4436+
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
4437+
"blocks per group (%lu) and clusters per group (%lu) inconsistent",
4438+
sbi->s_blocks_per_group, sbi->s_clusters_per_group);
4439+
return -EINVAL;
4440+
}
44454441
sbi->s_cluster_ratio = clustersize / sb->s_blocksize;
44464442

44474443
/* Do we have standard group size of clustersize * 8 blocks ? */

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)