IB/cm: use rwlock for MAD agent lock

JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-110100

commit 4dab26b
Author: Jacob Moroni <jmoroni@google.com>
Date:   Thu Feb 20 17:56:12 2025 +0000

    IB/cm: use rwlock for MAD agent lock

    In workloads where there are many processes establishing connections using
    RDMA CM in parallel (large scale MPI), there can be heavy contention for
    mad_agent_lock in cm_alloc_msg.

    This contention can occur while inside of a spin_lock_irq region, leading
    to interrupts being disabled for extended durations on many
    cores. Furthermore, it leads to the serialization of rdma_create_ah calls,
    which has negative performance impacts for NICs which are capable of
    processing multiple address handle creations in parallel.

    The end result is the machine becoming unresponsive, hung task warnings,
    netdev TX timeouts, etc.

    Since the lock appears to be only for protection from cm_remove_one, it
    can be changed to a rwlock to resolve these issues.

    Reproducer:

    Server:
      for i in $(seq 1 512); do
        ucmatose -c 32 -p $((i + 5000)) &
      done

    Client:
      for i in $(seq 1 512); do
        ucmatose -c 32 -p $((i + 5000)) -s 10.2.0.52 &
      done

    Fixes: 76039ac ("IB/cm: Protect cm_dev, cm_ports and mad_agent with kref and lock")
    Link: https://patch.msgid.link/r/20250220175612.2763122-1-jmoroni@google.com
    Signed-off-by: Jacob Moroni <jmoroni@google.com>
    Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
    Reviewed-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
    Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
    Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Signed-off-by: Kamal Heib <kheib@redhat.com>

Author: Kamalheib

drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c

@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ struct cm_port {
 struct cm_device {
 	struct kref kref;
 	struct list_head list;
-	spinlock_t mad_agent_lock;
+	rwlock_t mad_agent_lock;
 	struct ib_device *ib_device;
 	u8 ack_delay;
 	int going_down;
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static struct ib_mad_send_buf *cm_alloc_msg(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv)
 	if (!cm_id_priv->av.port)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	spin_lock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
+	read_lock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
 	mad_agent = cm_id_priv->av.port->mad_agent;
 	if (!mad_agent) {
 		m = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static struct ib_mad_send_buf *cm_alloc_msg(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv)
 	m->ah = ah;
 
 out:
-	spin_unlock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
+	read_unlock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
 	return m;
 }
 
@@ -1297,10 +1297,10 @@ static __be64 cm_form_tid(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv)
 	if (!cm_id_priv->av.port)
 		return cpu_to_be64(low_tid);
 
-	spin_lock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
+	read_lock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
 	if (cm_id_priv->av.port->mad_agent)
 		hi_tid = ((u64)cm_id_priv->av.port->mad_agent->hi_tid) << 32;
-	spin_unlock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
+	read_unlock(&cm_id_priv->av.port->cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
 	return cpu_to_be64(hi_tid | low_tid);
 }
 
@@ -4378,7 +4378,7 @@ static int cm_add_one(struct ib_device *ib_device)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	kref_init(&cm_dev->kref);
-	spin_lock_init(&cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
+	rwlock_init(&cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
 	cm_dev->ib_device = ib_device;
 	cm_dev->ack_delay = ib_device->attrs.local_ca_ack_delay;
 	cm_dev->going_down = 0;
@@ -4494,9 +4494,9 @@ static void cm_remove_one(struct ib_device *ib_device, void *client_data)
 		 * The above ensures no call paths from the work are running,
 		 * the remaining paths all take the mad_agent_lock.
 		 */
-		spin_lock(&cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
+		write_lock(&cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
 		port->mad_agent = NULL;
-		spin_unlock(&cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
+		write_unlock(&cm_dev->mad_agent_lock);
 		ib_unregister_mad_agent(mad_agent);
 		ib_port_unregister_client_groups(ib_device, i,
 						 cm_counter_groups);