Commit 6f1678e
scsi: lpfc: Ignore ndlp rport mismatch in dev_loss_tmo callbk
JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-82167
commit 23ed628
Author: Justin Tee <justin.tee@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu Jan 30 16:05:21 2025 -0800
scsi: lpfc: Ignore ndlp rport mismatch in dev_loss_tmo callbk
With repeated port swaps between separate fabrics, there can be multiple
registrations for fabric well known address 0xfffffe. This can cause ndlp
reference confusion due to the usage of a single ndlp ptr that stores the
rport object in fc_rport struct private storage during transport
registration. Subsequent registrations update the ndlp->rport field with
the newer rport, so when transport layer triggers dev_loss_tmo for the
earlier registered rport the ndlp->rport private storage is referencing the
newer rport instead of the older rport in dev_loss_tmo callbk.
Because the older ndlp->rport object is already cleaned up elsewhere in
driver code during the time of fabric swap, check that the rport provided
in dev_loss_tmo callbk actually matches the rport stored in the LLDD's
ndlp->rport field. Otherwise, skip dev_loss_tmo work on a stale rport.
Signed-off-by: Justin Tee <justin.tee@broadcom.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250131000524.163662-4-justintee8345@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dkennedy@redhat.com>1 parent c3edac4 commit 6f1678e
1 file changed
+9
-3
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
228 | 228 | | |
229 | 229 | | |
230 | 230 | | |
231 | | - | |
232 | | - | |
233 | | - | |
| 231 | + | |
| 232 | + | |
| 233 | + | |
| 234 | + | |
| 235 | + | |
| 236 | + | |
| 237 | + | |
| 238 | + | |
234 | 239 | | |
| 240 | + | |
235 | 241 | | |
236 | 242 | | |
237 | 243 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments