KVM: s390: fix LPSWEY handling

jira LE-3201
Rebuild_History Non-Buildable kernel-rt-4.18.0-553.22.1.rt7.363.el8_10
commit-author Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
commit 4c6abb7

in rare cases, e.g. for injecting a machine check we do intercept all
load PSW instructions via ICTL_LPSW. With facility 193 a new variant
LPSWEY was added. KVM needs to handle that as well.

Fixes: a3efa84 ("KVM: s390: gen_facilities: allow facilities 165, 193, 194 and 196")
	Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
	Reviewed-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
	Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
	Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20240628163547.2314-1-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4c6abb7)
	Signed-off-by: Jonathan Maple <jmaple@ciq.com>

Author: PlaidCat

arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h

@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_stat {
 	u64 instruction_io_other;
 	u64 instruction_lpsw;
 	u64 instruction_lpswe;
+	u64 instruction_lpswey;
 	u64 instruction_pfmf;
 	u64 instruction_ptff;
 	u64 instruction_sck;

arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c

@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ const struct _kvm_stats_desc kvm_vcpu_stats_desc[] = {
 	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_io_other),
 	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_lpsw),
 	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_lpswe),
+	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_lpswey),
 	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_pfmf),
 	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_ptff),
 	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VCPU, instruction_sck),

arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h

@@ -120,6 +120,21 @@ static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_s(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 *ar)
 	return (base2 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base2] : 0) + disp2;
 }
 
+static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_siy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 *ar)
+{
+	u32 base1 = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb >> 28;
+	s64 disp1;
+
+	/* The displacement is a 20bit _SIGNED_ value */
+	disp1 = sign_extend64(((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x0fff0000) >> 16) +
+			      ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0xff00) << 4), 19);
+
+	if (ar)
+		*ar = base1;
+
+	return (base1 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base1] : 0) + disp1;
+}
+
 static inline void kvm_s390_get_base_disp_sse(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 					      u64 *address1, u64 *address2,
 					      u8 *ar_b1, u8 *ar_b2)

arch/s390/kvm/priv.c

@@ -800,6 +800,36 @@ static int handle_lpswe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int handle_lpswey(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	psw_t new_psw;
+	u64 addr;
+	int rc;
+	u8 ar;
+
+	vcpu->stat.instruction_lpswey++;
+
+	if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 193))
+		return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);
+
+	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE)
+		return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_PRIVILEGED_OP);
+
+	addr = kvm_s390_get_base_disp_siy(vcpu, &ar);
+	if (addr & 7)
+		return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
+
+	rc = read_guest(vcpu, addr, ar, &new_psw, sizeof(new_psw));
+	if (rc)
+		return kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond(vcpu, rc);
+
+	vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw = new_psw;
+	if (!is_valid_psw(&vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw))
+		return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int handle_stidp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	u64 stidp_data = vcpu->kvm->arch.model.cpuid;
@@ -1465,6 +1495,8 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_eb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	case 0x61:
 	case 0x62:
 		return handle_ri(vcpu);
+	case 0x71:
+		return handle_lpswey(vcpu);
 	default:
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}