-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
002 Minutes June 17, 2019
Nishant Shukla edited this page Jun 18, 2019
·
2 revisions
- Introduce yourself (5 min)
- DMPL status update (10 min)
- Personal Utility Model update (5 min)
- Behavior constraint definition language proposal to begin specs (5 min)
- Other proposals (5 min)
- [Nishant] Ensure accessibility standards manifest in act messages.
- Nishant
- Tim
- John
- Arpana
- Yanick
- [All] Intros.
- [Nishant] Demonstration of DMPL progress.
- [Nishant] Any questions?
- [Yanick] ML techniques allows fixing conversations while they happen. How is that possible within this JSON spec?
- [Nishant] The JSON spec outlines what actions are possible, but not which are preferred. The Personal Utility Model is one way to specify preferences, so that ML techniques may adjust weights from training data.
- [Yanick] How is scalability addressed?
- [John, Tim] Scripting animations has some guidelines (blind users for example). Animations need textual alternatives ("audio description", like CC). Need to think about this textualization for Act messages
- all outputs are available on-demand
- is the animation important or not? priority flag? so that runtime will know whether it should be described.
- CC always in audio and text for all intents
- However, there's more flexibility for audio descriptions of animations. Over-doing it may hurt more than help.
- input statements should be as open as possible, too