Commit e8794ff
committed
Auto merge of rust-lang#121123 - compiler-errors:item-assumptions, r=oli-obk
Split an item bounds and an item's super predicates
This is the moral equivalent of rust-lang#107614, but instead for predicates this applies to **item bounds**. This PR splits out the item bounds (i.e. *all* predicates that are assumed to hold for the alias) from the item *super predicates*, which are the subset of item bounds which share the same self type as the alias.
## Why?
Much like rust-lang#107614, there are places in the compiler where we *only* care about super-predicates, and considering predicates that possibly don't have anything to do with the alias is problematic. This includes things like closure signature inference (which is at its core searching for `Self: Fn(..)` style bounds), but also lints like `#[must_use]`, error reporting for aliases, computing type outlives predicates.
Even in cases where considering all of the `item_bounds` doesn't lead to bugs, unnecessarily considering irrelevant bounds does lead to a regression (rust-lang#121121) due to doing extra work in the solver.
## Example 1 - Trait Aliases
This is best explored via an example:
```
type TAIT<T> = impl TraitAlias<T>;
trait TraitAlias<T> = A + B where T: C;
```
The item bounds list for `Tait<T>` will include:
* `Tait<T>: A`
* `Tait<T>: B`
* `T: C`
While `item_super_predicates` query will include just the first two predicates.
Side-note: You may wonder why `T: C` is included in the item bounds for `TAIT`? This is because when we elaborate `TraitAlias<T>`, we will also elaborate all the predicates on the trait.
## Example 2 - Associated Type Bounds
```
type TAIT<T> = impl Iterator<Item: A>;
```
The `item_bounds` list for `TAIT<T>` will include:
* `Tait<T>: Iterator`
* `<Tait<T> as Iterator>::Item: A`
But the `item_super_predicates` will just include the first bound, since that's the only bound that is relevant to the *alias* itself.
## So what
This leads to some diagnostics duplication just like rust-lang#107614, but none of it will be user-facing. We only see it in the UI test suite because we explicitly disable diagnostic deduplication.
Regarding naming, I went with `super_predicates` kind of arbitrarily; this can easily be changed, but I'd consider better names as long as we don't block this PR in perpetuity.2 files changed
+5
-5
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
64 | 64 | | |
65 | 65 | | |
66 | 66 | | |
67 | | - | |
| 67 | + | |
68 | 68 | | |
69 | 69 | | |
70 | 70 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
96 | 96 | | |
97 | 97 | | |
98 | 98 | | |
99 | | - | |
| 99 | + | |
100 | 100 | | |
101 | 101 | | |
102 | 102 | | |
| |||
328 | 328 | | |
329 | 329 | | |
330 | 330 | | |
331 | | - | |
| 331 | + | |
332 | 332 | | |
333 | 333 | | |
334 | 334 | | |
| |||
729 | 729 | | |
730 | 730 | | |
731 | 731 | | |
732 | | - | |
| 732 | + | |
733 | 733 | | |
734 | 734 | | |
735 | 735 | | |
| |||
807 | 807 | | |
808 | 808 | | |
809 | 809 | | |
810 | | - | |
| 810 | + | |
811 | 811 | | |
812 | 812 | | |
813 | 813 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments