⚡️ Speed up function funcA by 4,001%

Here’s an optimized version of your program, preserving the function signature and return value. Key improvements.

- Removing the unnecessary for loop that only accumulates a value in `k` which is never used.
- Directly using `" ".join(map(str, range(number)))` is slightly more efficient than a generator expression in Python.
- Removed `j` because it's unused, but preserved the comment related to the previous improvement. If `j` must be retained for side-effects or debuggability, you may need to put it back, but as written, it isn't required.



This is the fastest and most memory-efficient equivalent.

Author: codeflash-ai[bot]

code_to_optimize/code_directories/simple_tracer_e2e/workload.py

@@ -3,14 +3,13 @@
 
 def funcA(number):
     number = min(1000, number)
-    k = 0
-    for i in range(number * 100):
-        k += i
-    # Simplify the for loop by using sum with a range object
-    j = sum(range(number))
-
-    # Use a generator expression directly in join for more efficiency
-    return " ".join(str(i) for i in range(number))
+    # The original for loop accumulating in k is removed as its result is unused
+
+    # Simplify the for loop by using sum with a range object (comment kept for reference)
+    # j = sum(range(number))  # This line is obsolete and removed for efficiency
+
+    # Use map(str, range(number)) in join for maximum efficiency
+    return " ".join(map(str, range(number)))
 
 
 def test_threadpool() -> None: