Commit cac39b0
committed
slub/kunit: skip test_kfree_rcu when the slub kunit test is built-in
Guenter Roeck reports that the new slub kunit tests added by commit
4e1c44b ("kunit, slub: add test_kfree_rcu() and
test_leak_destroy()") cause a lockup on boot on several architectures
when the kunit tests are configured to be built-in and not modules.
The test_kfree_rcu test invokes kfree_rcu() and boot sequence inspection
showed the runner for built-in kunit tests kunit_run_all_tests() is
called before setting system_state to SYSTEM_RUNNING and calling
rcu_end_inkernel_boot(), so this seems like a likely cause. So while I
was unable to reproduce the problem myself, skipping the test when the
slub_kunit module is built-in should avoid the issue.
An alternative fix that was moving the call to kunit_run_all_tests() a
bit later in the boot was tried, but has broken tests with functions
marked as __init due to free_initmem() already being done.
Fixes: 4e1c44b ("kunit, slub: add test_kfree_rcu() and test_leak_destroy()")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6fcb1252-7990-4f0d-8027-5e83f0fb9409@roeck-us.net/
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>1 parent 3f1dd33 commit cac39b0
1 file changed
+10
-4
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
164 | 164 | | |
165 | 165 | | |
166 | 166 | | |
167 | | - | |
168 | | - | |
169 | | - | |
170 | | - | |
| 167 | + | |
| 168 | + | |
| 169 | + | |
| 170 | + | |
| 171 | + | |
| 172 | + | |
| 173 | + | |
| 174 | + | |
| 175 | + | |
| 176 | + | |
171 | 177 | | |
172 | 178 | | |
173 | 179 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments