Skip to content

Commit 8275e74

Browse files
Tom's Sept 21 edits of second Cass-Koopmans lecture
1 parent 20b9a01 commit 8275e74

File tree

1 file changed

+25
-10
lines changed

1 file changed

+25
-10
lines changed

lectures/cass_koopmans_2.md

Lines changed: 25 additions & 10 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ named after the 1972 economics Nobel prize winners.
212212

213213

214214
But because $q^0_t$ is a **relative price**, the units in terms of
215-
which prices are quoted are arbitrary, we are free to re-normalize them.
215+
which prices are quoted are arbitrary, we are free to re-normalize them by multiplying all of them by a positive scalar, say $\lambda > 0$.
216216

217217
Units of $q_t^0$ could be set so that
218218

@@ -331,11 +331,12 @@ w_t 1+ \eta_t k_t
331331
$$
332332

333333
At $t$ the household allocates its income to the following
334-
purchases
334+
purchases between the following two categories:
335+
336+
* consumption $c_t$
337+
338+
* net investment $k_{t+1} -(1-\delta)k_t$
335339

336-
$$
337-
\left(c_t + (k_{t+1} -(1-\delta)k_t)\right)
338-
$$
339340

340341
Here $\left(k_{t+1} -(1-\delta)k_t\right)$ is the household's
341342
net investment in physical capital and $\delta \in (0,1)$ is
@@ -377,19 +378,33 @@ $$
377378
\begin{aligned}& \max_{\vec{c}, \vec{k} } \sum_{t=0}^T \beta^t u(c_t) \\ \text{subject to} \ \ & \sum_{t=0}^T q_t^0\left(c_t +\left(k_{t+1}-(1-\delta) k_t\right) -w_t -\eta_t k_t\right) \leq 0 \notag \end{aligned}
378379
$$
379380

381+
Components of a **price system** have the following units:
382+
383+
* $w_t$ is measured in units of the time $t$ good per unit of time $t$ labor hired
384+
385+
* $\eta_t$ is measured in units of the time $t$ good per unit of time $t$ capital hired
386+
387+
* $q_t^0$ is measured in units of the time $t$ good per unit of a numeraire
388+
389+
380390
### Definitions
381391

382392
- A **price system** is a sequence
383393
$\{q_t^0,\eta_t,w_t\}_{t=0}^T= \{\vec{q}, \vec{\eta}, \vec{w}\}$.
384394
- An **allocation** is a sequence
385395
$\{c_t,k_{t+1},n_t=1\}_{t=0}^T = \{\vec{c}, \vec{k}, \vec{n}\}$.
386396
- A **competitive equilibrium** is a price system and an allocation
387-
for which
397+
with the following properties:
388398
- Given the price system, the allocation solves the household's
389399
problem.
390400
- Given the price system, the allocation solves the firm's
391401
problem.
392402

403+
404+
The vision here is that an equilibrium price system and allocation are determined once and for all.
405+
406+
In effect, we imagine that all trades occur just before time $0$.
407+
393408
## Computing a Competitive Equilibrium
394409

395410
We compute a competitive equilibrium by using a **guess and
@@ -420,7 +435,7 @@ In particular, we guess that for $t=0,\dots,T$:
420435
```{math}
421436
:label: eq-price
422437
423-
\lambda q_t^0 = \beta^t u'(K_t) =\beta^t \mu_t
438+
q_t^0 = \beta^t u'(K_t)
424439
```
425440

426441
```{math}
@@ -435,7 +450,7 @@ w_t = f(K_t) -K_t f'(K_t)
435450
\eta_t = f'(K_t)
436451
```
437452

438-
At these prices, let the capital chosen by the household be
453+
At these prices, let capital chosen by the household be
439454

440455
```{math}
441456
:label: eq-pr4
@@ -470,7 +485,7 @@ $$
470485
c_t^* + k_{t+1}^* - (1-\delta) k_t^* = F(\tilde k_t^*, \tilde n_t^*)
471486
$$
472487

473-
We shall verify that for $t=0,\dots,T$ the allocations chosen
488+
We shall verify that for $t=0,\dots,T$ allocations chosen
474489
by the household and the firm both equal the allocation that solves
475490
the planning problem:
476491

@@ -482,7 +497,7 @@ k^*_t = \tilde k^*_t=K_t, \tilde n_t=1, c^*_t=C_t
482497

483498
### Verification Procedure
484499

485-
Our approach is to stare at first-order necessary conditions for the
500+
Our approach is to stare at first-order necessary conditions for
486501
optimization problems of the household and the firm.
487502

488503
At the price system we have guessed, we'll then verify that both sets of first-order

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)