You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
abstract = {We quantitatively identify the factors that drive wealth dynamics in the United States and are consistent with its skewed cross-sectional distribution and with social mobility. We concentrate on three critical factors: (i) skewed earnings, (ii) differential saving rates across wealth levels, and (iii) stochastic idiosyncratic returns to wealth. All of these are fundamental for matching both distribution and mobility. The stochastic process for returns which best fits the cross-sectional distribution of wealth and social mobility in the United States shares several statistical properties with those of the returns to wealth uncovered by Fagereng et al. (2017) from tax records in Norway.},
2524
+
language = {en},
2525
+
number = {5},
2526
+
urldate = {2023-02-03},
2527
+
journal = {American Economic Review},
2528
+
author = {Benhabib, Jess and Bisin, Alberto and Luo, Mi},
2529
+
month = may,
2530
+
year = {2019},
2531
+
keywords = {Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions, General Aggregative Models: Neoclassical, Macroeconomics: Consumption, Saving, Wealth, Aggregate Factor Income Distribution},
As you might notice, unlike other Markov chain we have seen before, it has a periodic cycle.
965
+
As you might notice, unlike other Markov chains we have seen before, it has a periodic cycle.
973
966
974
967
This is formally called [periodicity](https://stats.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Probability_Theory/Probability_Mathematical_Statistics_and_Stochastic_Processes_(Siegrist)/16:_Markov_Processes/16.05:_Periodicity_of_Discrete-Time_Chains#:~:text=A%20state%20in%20a%20discrete,limiting%20behavior%20of%20the%20chain.).
975
968
@@ -1016,8 +1009,6 @@ stationary distribution regardless of where we begin.
1016
1009
1017
1010
For example, we have the following result
1018
1011
1019
-
TODO -- convert to theorem environment
1020
-
1021
1012
```{prf:theorem}
1022
1013
:label: strict_stationary
1023
1014
@@ -1269,37 +1260,10 @@ $$
1269
1260
1270
1261
TODO -- connect to the Neumann series lemma (Maanasee)
1271
1262
1272
-
1273
-
TODO -- verify the link.
1274
-
1275
-
1276
1263
## Exercises
1277
1264
1278
-
TODO: Add this into bib file
1279
-
1280
-
@article{benhabib_wealth_2019,
1281
-
title = {Wealth {Distribution} and {Social} {Mobility} in the {US}: {A} {Quantitative} {Approach}},
1282
-
volume = {109},
1283
-
issn = {0002-8282},
1284
-
shorttitle = {Wealth {Distribution} and {Social} {Mobility} in the {US}},
abstract = {We quantitatively identify the factors that drive wealth dynamics in the United States and are consistent with its skewed cross-sectional distribution and with social mobility. We concentrate on three critical factors: (i) skewed earnings, (ii) differential saving rates across wealth levels, and (iii) stochastic idiosyncratic returns to wealth. All of these are fundamental for matching both distribution and mobility. The stochastic process for returns which best fits the cross-sectional distribution of wealth and social mobility in the United States shares several statistical properties with those of the returns to wealth uncovered by Fagereng et al. (2017) from tax records in Norway.},
1288
-
language = {en},
1289
-
number = {5},
1290
-
urldate = {2023-02-03},
1291
-
journal = {American Economic Review},
1292
-
author = {Benhabib, Jess and Bisin, Alberto and Luo, Mi},
1293
-
month = may,
1294
-
year = {2019},
1295
-
keywords = {Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions, General Aggregative Models: Neoclassical, Macroeconomics: Consumption, Saving, Wealth, Aggregate Factor Income Distribution},
1296
-
pages = {1623--1647},
1297
-
file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/humphreyyang/Zotero/storage/P93BG5IZ/Benhabib et al. - 2019 - Wealth Distribution and Social Mobility in the US.pdf:application/pdf},
1298
-
}
1299
-
1300
-
1301
-
```{exercise}
1302
-
:label: fm_ex1
1265
+
````{exercise}
1266
+
:label: mc_ex1
1303
1267
1304
1268
Benhabib el al. {cite}`benhabib_wealth_2019` estimated that the transition matrix for social mobility as the following
1305
1269
@@ -1335,9 +1299,9 @@ In this exercise,
1335
1299
1336
1300
1. use simulation to show ergodicity.
1337
1301
1338
-
```
1302
+
````
1339
1303
1340
-
```{solution-start}
1304
+
```{solution-start}mc_ex1
1341
1305
:class: dropdown
1342
1306
```
1343
1307
@@ -1399,7 +1363,7 @@ We can see that the time spent at each state quickly converges to the stationary
1399
1363
1400
1364
1401
1365
```{exercise}
1402
-
:label: fm_ex2
1366
+
:label: mc_ex2
1403
1367
1404
1368
According to the discussion {ref}`above <mc_eg1-2>`, if a worker's employment dynamics obey the stochastic matrix
1405
1369
@@ -1438,7 +1402,7 @@ $(0, 1)$.
1438
1402
The result should be similar to the plot we plotted [here](ergo)
1439
1403
```
1440
1404
1441
-
```{solution-start}fm_ex2
1405
+
```{solution-start}mc_ex2
1442
1406
:class: dropdown
1443
1407
```
1444
1408
@@ -1482,7 +1446,7 @@ plt.show()
1482
1446
```
1483
1447
1484
1448
```{exercise}
1485
-
:label: fm_ex3
1449
+
:label: mc_ex3
1486
1450
1487
1451
In `quantecon` library, irreducibility is tested by checking whether the chain forms a [strongly connected component](https://networkx.org/documentation/stable/reference/algorithms/generated/networkx.algorithms.components.is_strongly_connected.html).
1488
1452
@@ -1496,27 +1460,7 @@ Based on this claim, write a function to test irreducibility.
1496
1460
1497
1461
```
1498
1462
1499
-
TODO:
1500
-
1501
-
add to .bib
1502
-
1503
-
@book{zhao_power_2012,
1504
-
address = {Boston, MA},
1505
-
series = {{SpringerBriefs} in {Computer} {Science}},
1506
-
title = {Power {Distribution} and {Performance} {Analysis} for {Wireless} {Communication} {Networks}},
0 commit comments