Skip to content

Commit 78a3bea

Browse files
Tom and Humphrey's repair work on cagan_ree.md
1 parent b0f9a12 commit 78a3bea

File tree

1 file changed

+10
-10
lines changed

1 file changed

+10
-10
lines changed

sandpit/cagan_ree.md

Lines changed: 10 additions & 10 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1-
## A fiscal theory of the price level
1+
## A Fiscal Theory of the Price Level
22

33

44
### Introduction
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ $$ (eq:piterm)
210210
211211
where we require that $\vert \gamma^* \delta \vert < 1$.
212212
213-
### Some Quantitative Experiments
213+
### Some quantitative experiments
214214
215215
In the experiments below, we'll use formula {eq}`eq:piterm` as our terminal condition for expected inflation.
216216
@@ -230,9 +230,7 @@ $$
230230
231231
so that, in terms of our notation and formula for $\theta_{T+1}^*$ above, $\tilde \gamma = 1$.
232232
233-
#### Experiment 1
234-
235-
**A foreseen sudden stabilization**
233+
#### Experiment 1: foreseen sudden stabilization
236234
237235
In this experiment, we'll study how, when $\alpha >0$, a foreseen inflation stabilization has effects on inflation that proceed it.
238236
@@ -251,9 +249,7 @@ $$
251249
$$
252250
253251
254-
#### Experiment 2
255-
256-
**An unforeseen sudden stabilization**
252+
#### Experiment 2: an unforeseen sudden stabilization
257253
258254
This experiment deviates a little bit from a pure version our "perfect foresight"
259255
assumption by assuming that a sudden permanent reduction in $\mu_t$ like that
@@ -285,7 +281,7 @@ $\mu_s = \mu^*$ for all $s \geq T_1$.
285281
286282
287283
288-
#### The Log Price Level
284+
#### The log price level
289285
290286
291287
We can use equations {eq}`eq:caganmd` and {eq}`eq:ree`
@@ -308,7 +304,11 @@ equation {eq}`eq:pformula2`, the log of real balances jumps
308304
But in order for $m_t - p_t$ to jump, which variable jumps, $m_{T_1}$ or $p_{T_1}$?
309305
310306
311-
#### Jump in $p_{T_1}$ or jump in $m_{T_1}$?
307+
#### What jumps?
308+
309+
What jumps at $T_1$?
310+
311+
Is it $p_{T_1}$ or $m_{T_1}$?
312312
313313
314314
If we insist that the money supply $m_{T_1}$ is locked at its value $m_{T_1}^1$ inherited from the past, then formula {eq}`eq:pformula2` implies that the price level jumps downward at time $T_1$, to coincide with the downward jump in

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)