You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: sandpit/cagan_ree.md
+10-10Lines changed: 10 additions & 10 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1
-
## A fiscal theory of the price level
1
+
## A Fiscal Theory of the Price Level
2
2
3
3
4
4
### Introduction
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ $$ (eq:piterm)
210
210
211
211
where we require that $\vert \gamma^* \delta \vert < 1$.
212
212
213
-
### Some Quantitative Experiments
213
+
### Some quantitative experiments
214
214
215
215
In the experiments below, we'll use formula {eq}`eq:piterm` as our terminal condition for expected inflation.
216
216
@@ -230,9 +230,7 @@ $$
230
230
231
231
so that, in terms of our notation and formula for $\theta_{T+1}^*$ above, $\tilde \gamma = 1$.
232
232
233
-
#### Experiment 1
234
-
235
-
**A foreseen sudden stabilization**
233
+
#### Experiment 1: foreseen sudden stabilization
236
234
237
235
In this experiment, we'll study how, when $\alpha >0$, a foreseen inflation stabilization has effects on inflation that proceed it.
238
236
@@ -251,9 +249,7 @@ $$
251
249
$$
252
250
253
251
254
-
#### Experiment 2
255
-
256
-
**An unforeseen sudden stabilization**
252
+
#### Experiment 2: an unforeseen sudden stabilization
257
253
258
254
This experiment deviates a little bit from a pure version our "perfect foresight"
259
255
assumption by assuming that a sudden permanent reduction in $\mu_t$ like that
@@ -285,7 +281,7 @@ $\mu_s = \mu^*$ for all $s \geq T_1$.
285
281
286
282
287
283
288
-
#### The Log Price Level
284
+
#### The log price level
289
285
290
286
291
287
We can use equations {eq}`eq:caganmd` and {eq}`eq:ree`
@@ -308,7 +304,11 @@ equation {eq}`eq:pformula2`, the log of real balances jumps
308
304
But in order for $m_t - p_t$ to jump, which variable jumps, $m_{T_1}$ or $p_{T_1}$?
309
305
310
306
311
-
#### Jump in $p_{T_1}$ or jump in $m_{T_1}$?
307
+
#### What jumps?
308
+
309
+
What jumps at $T_1$?
310
+
311
+
Is it $p_{T_1}$ or $m_{T_1}$?
312
312
313
313
314
314
If we insist that the money supply $m_{T_1}$ is locked at its value $m_{T_1}^1$ inherited from the past, then formula {eq}`eq:pformula2` implies that the price level jumps downward at time $T_1$, to coincide with the downward jump in
0 commit comments