You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: in-work/quantecon_undergrad_notes_tom_3.md
+20-12Lines changed: 20 additions & 12 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -139,12 +139,17 @@ $$
139
139
140
140
Let
141
141
142
-
* $\Pi$ be an $n\times n$ matrix of XXXX,
142
+
* $\Pi$ be an $n\times n$ matrix,
143
143
* $c$ be an $n \times 1$ vector of consumptions of various goods,
144
144
* $b$ be an $n \times 1$ vector of bliss points,
145
145
* $e$ be an $n \times 1$ vector of endowments, and
146
146
* $p$ be an $n\times 1$ vector of prices
147
147
148
+
We assume that $\Pi$ has an inverse $\Pi^{-1}$ and that $\Pi^\top \Pi$ is a positive definite matrix.
149
+
150
+
The matrix $\Pi$ describes a consumer's willingness to substitute one good for another, for each pair of
151
+
good in the $n \times 1$ vector $c$.
152
+
148
153
A consumer faces $p$ as a price taker and chooses $c$ to maximize the utility function
149
154
150
155
$$
@@ -157,6 +162,16 @@ $$
157
162
p ^\top (c -e ) = 0
158
163
$$ (eq:old2)
159
164
165
+
We shall specify examples in which $\Pi$ and $b$ are such that it typically happens that
166
+
167
+
$$
168
+
\Pi b > > c
169
+
$$ (eq:bversusc)
170
+
171
+
so that utility function {eq}`eq:old2` tells us that the consumer has consumes of each good that he wants.
172
+
173
+
Condition {eq}`eq:bversusc` will ultimately assure us that competitive equilibrium prices are all positive.
174
+
160
175
## Digression: Marshallian and Hicksian Demand Curves
161
176
162
177
**Remark:** We'll use budget constraint {eq}`eq:old2` in situations in which a consumers's endowment vector $e$ is his **only** source of income. But sometimes we'll instead assume that the consumer has other sources of income (positive or negative) and write his budget constraint as
@@ -182,7 +197,7 @@ Marshallian and Hicksian demand curves describe different mental experiments:
182
197
183
198
* For a Hicksian demand curve, hypothetical price vector changes produce changes in quantities determined that have only **substitution** effects
184
199
185
-
* changes in the price vector leave the $p^e + W$ unaltered because we freeze $\mu$ and solve for $W$
200
+
* changes in the price vector leave the $p^\top e + W$ unaltered because we freeze $\mu$ and solve for $W$
186
201
187
202
Sometimes a Hicksian demand curve is called a **compensated** demand curve in order to emphasize that, to disarm the income (or wealth) effect associated with a price change, the consumer's wealth $W$ is adjusted.
188
203
@@ -523,10 +538,12 @@ $$
523
538
-.5 \mu^{-1}(\Pi c -b) ^\top (\Pi c -b ) -h c - .5 c^\top J c
524
539
$$
525
540
541
+
In this formulation, $\mu$ is a parameter that describes how the planner weights interests of outside suppliers and our representative consumer.
542
+
526
543
The first-order condition with respect to $c$ is
527
544
528
545
$$
529
-
- \mu^{-1} \Pi^\top \Pi c + \mu^{-1}\Pi^\top b - h - .5 H c = 0
546
+
- \mu^{-1} \Pi^\top \Pi c + \mu^{-1}\Pi^\top b - h - H c = 0
530
547
$$
531
548
532
549
which implies {eq}`eq:old5p`.
@@ -548,12 +565,3 @@ Two types of represenative agent
0 commit comments