|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +jupytext: |
| 3 | + text_representation: |
| 4 | + extension: .md |
| 5 | + format_name: myst |
| 6 | + format_version: 0.13 |
| 7 | + jupytext_version: 1.14.4 |
| 8 | +kernelspec: |
| 9 | + display_name: Python 3 (ipykernel) |
| 10 | + language: python |
| 11 | + name: python3 |
| 12 | +--- |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +# The Overlapping Generations Model |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +In this lecture we study the overlapping generations model. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +This model provide controllable alternative to infinite-horizon representative agent. |
| 20 | +The dynamics of this model in some special cases are quite similar to Solow model. |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +## The Model |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +Let's assume that: |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +- Time is discrete and runs to infinity. |
| 27 | +- Each individual lives for two time periods. |
| 28 | +- Individuals born at time $t$ live for dates $t$ and $t + 1$. |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +Suppose that the utility functions take the familiar Constant Relative Risk Aversion (CRRA) form, given by: |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +```{math} |
| 33 | +:label: eq_crra |
| 34 | + U(t) = \frac{c_1(t)^{1-\theta}-1}{1-\theta} + |
| 35 | + \beta \left( \frac{c_2(1+t)^{1-\theta}-1}{1-\theta} \right ) |
| 36 | +``` |
| 37 | +where, |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +- $\theta > 0$, and $\beta \in (0, 1)$ is the discount factor. |
| 40 | +- $c_1(t)$: consumption of the individual born at $t$. |
| 41 | +- $c_2(t)$: consumption of the individual at $t+1$. |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +For each integer $t \geq 0$, output $Y(t)$ in period $t$ is given by |
| 44 | +$$ |
| 45 | +Y(t) = F(K(t), L(t)) |
| 46 | +$$ |
| 47 | +where $K(t)$ is capital, $L(t)$ is labor and $F$ is an aggregate |
| 48 | +production function. |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +Without population growth, $L(t)$ equals some constant $L$. |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +Setting $k(t) := K(t) / L$, $f(k)=F(K, 1)$ and using homogeneity of degree one now yields: |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +$$ |
| 56 | + 1 + r(t) = R(t) = f'(k(t)) |
| 57 | +$$ |
| 58 | +The gross rate of return to saving is equal to the rental rate of capital. |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +And, the wage rate is given by, |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +$$ |
| 63 | + w(t) = f(k(t)) - k (t)f'(k(t)) |
| 64 | +$$ |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +Savings by an individual of generation $t$, $s(t)$, is determined as a |
| 68 | +solution to: |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +$$ |
| 72 | + \begin{aligned} |
| 73 | + \max_{c_1(t), c_2(t+1), s(t)} \ & u(c_1 (t)) + \beta u(c_2(t + 1)) \\ |
| 74 | + \mbox{subject to } \ & c_1(t) + s(t) \le w(t) \\ |
| 75 | + & c_2(t + 1) \le R (t + 1)s(t)\\ |
| 76 | + \end{aligned} |
| 77 | +$$ |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +Second constraint incorporates notion that individuals only spend |
| 80 | +money on their own end of life consumption. |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +Solving for consumption and thus for savings, |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +$$ |
| 85 | + s(t) = s(w(t), R(t + 1)) |
| 86 | +$$ |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +Total savings in the economy will be equal to: |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +$$ |
| 91 | + S(t) = s(t) L(t) |
| 92 | +$$ |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +We assume a closed economy, so domestic investment equals aggregate domestic |
| 95 | +saving. Therefore, we have |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +$$ |
| 98 | + K(t + 1) = L(t) s(w (t), R (t + 1)) |
| 99 | +$$ |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +Setting $k(t) := K(t) / L(t)$, where $L(t + 1) = (1 + n) L(t),$ and using homogeneity of degree one now yields: |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +```{math} |
| 104 | +:label: k_dyms |
| 105 | + k(t) = \frac{s(w (t), R (t + 1))}{1 + n} |
| 106 | +``` |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +A steady state is given by a solution to this equation such that |
| 111 | +$k(t + 1) = k (t) = k^*$, i.e, |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +```{math} |
| 114 | +:label: k_star |
| 115 | + k^* = \frac{s(f(k^*)-k^*f'(k^*), f'(k^*))}{1+n} |
| 116 | +``` |
0 commit comments