You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+15Lines changed: 15 additions & 0 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -147,6 +147,21 @@ Expected `SHA256` hash:
147
147
> Until then, this is the current one: `db3d79d31b50daa8c03a1e4f2025029cb137f9971aa04129d8bca004795ae524`
148
148
> There's also an archived version of the [baseline output](./data/baseline.output.gz)
149
149
150
+
## Differences From Original
151
+
I've decided that I would want this challenge to be turned way up to 11!
152
+
153
+
This means that there are some differences from the original.
154
+
155
+
The original results are calculated on a smaller set of weather stations: 400.\
156
+
While I haven't tabulated how many reside on the input file, we do not limit it to any number as we use the full ~40K stations present on `data/weather_stations.csv` to generate the input file.
157
+
158
+
Another difference is the machines these are run on.\
159
+
I'm using my own machine, with the specs mentioned on the [Results](#results) section bellow.\
160
+
I'm also allowing the use of the full 32 threads that my machine provides, where the original challenge limits it to 8.\
161
+
The original challenge also has a second results table with 10K stations and the use of all 64 threads.
162
+
163
+
With all this said, comparison with the original challenge should be made with this in mind.
164
+
150
165
## Results
151
166
These are the results from running all entries into the challenge on my personal computer:
0 commit comments