You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/governance/lit-improvement-proposals.mdx
+5-8Lines changed: 5 additions & 8 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -12,14 +12,11 @@ All LIPs are initially submitted and discussed in the relevant category of the L
12
12
13
13
All LIPs are tagged on the Lit governance forum and associated GitHub repo based on the specific stage they are in:
14
14
15
-
- “Idea”: initial proposal ideas are submitted to the [governance forum](https://litprotocol.discourse.group/) for discussion and refinement.
16
-
- “Draft”: after a proposal has moved past the “idea” stage, it is submitted to the [LIP repo](https://github.com/LIT-Protocol/Lit-Improvement-Proposals) as an official draft proposal.
17
-
- “Review”: after a draft proposal has been submitted, it is reviewed by the relevant parties which vary according to the context of the proposal itself.
18
-
- “Vote”: proposals that move to the “vote” stage are passed off to the Protocol Council for final review and approval.
19
-
- “Accepted”: proposals that have been reviewed and accepted by the Protocol Council.
20
-
- “Implementing”: proposals that are actively being implemented.
21
-
- “Completed”: proposals that have been accepted and implemented.
15
+
- “Draft”: initial proposals are to be submitted to the [governance forum](https://litprotocol.discourse.group/) for discussion and refinement. After a proposal has moved past the initial draft stage, it is submitted to the [LIP repo](https://github.com/LIT-Protocol/Lit-Improvement-Proposals) for review.
16
+
- “Review”: after a draft proposal has been submitted, it is reviewed by the relevant parties which vary according to the context of the proposal itself.
17
+
- “Accepted”: proposals that have been reviewed and accepted by the Protocol Council and are in active implementation.
22
18
- “Rejected”: proposals that have been rejected by the Protocol Council.
19
+
- “Completed”: proposals that have been accepted, implemented, and merged.
23
20
- “Closed”: proposals that have been closed.
24
21
25
22
## Lit Protocol Council Review Process
@@ -30,7 +27,7 @@ After a given LIP has been reviewed, the Protocol Council will report their deci
30
27
31
28
## Submitting LIPs
32
29
33
-
At this time, the Lit Protocol development company will be the primary party tasked with creating and submitting new LIPs. However, anyone can suggest improvements or changes by starting a discussion on the Lit governance forum using the applicable “idea” tag. All suggestions will be reviewed and prioritized according to current protocol objectives and available resources.
30
+
At this time, the Lit Protocol development company will be the primary party tasked with creating and submitting new LIPs. However, anyone can suggest improvements or changes by starting a discussion on the Lit [governance forum](https://lit.discourse.group/). All suggestions will be reviewed and prioritized according to current protocol objectives and available resources.
34
31
35
32
The Protocol Council—in coordination with the Lit Association—will be the core body tasked with reviewing and approving or rejecting all LIPs at this time. Once Lit Protocol and its associated governance processes have reached a greater level of maturity and stability, the Protocol Council may be dissolved entirely with governance decision making being passed off to relevant ecosystem stakeholders and working groups.
0 commit comments