Improve the yield() documentation (#4260)

Author: dkhalanskyjb

kotlinx-coroutines-core/common/src/Yield.kt

@@ -4,23 +4,143 @@ import kotlinx.coroutines.internal.*
 import kotlin.coroutines.intrinsics.*
 
 /**
- * Yields the thread (or thread pool) of the current coroutine dispatcher
- * to other coroutines on the same dispatcher to run if possible.
+ * Suspends this coroutine and immediately schedules it for further execution.
  *
+ * A coroutine run uninterrupted on a thread until the coroutine *suspend*,
+ * giving other coroutines a chance to use that thread for their own computations.
+ * Normally, coroutines suspend whenever they wait for something to happen:
+ * for example, trying to receive a value from a channel that's currently empty will suspend.
+ * Sometimes, a coroutine does not need to wait for anything,
+ * but we still want it to give other coroutines a chance to run.
+ * Calling [yield] has this effect:
+ *
+ * ```
+ * fun updateProgressBar(value: Int, marker: String) {
+ *     print(marker)
+ * }
+ * val singleThreadedDispatcher = Dispatchers.Default.limitedParallelism(1)
+ * withContext(singleThreadedDispatcher) {
+ *     launch {
+ *         repeat(5) {
+ *             updateProgressBar(it, "A")
+ *             yield()
+ *         }
+ *     }
+ *     launch {
+ *         repeat(5) {
+ *             updateProgressBar(it, "B")
+ *             yield()
+ *         }
+ *     }
+ * }
+ * ```
+ *
+ * In this example, without the [yield], first, `A` would run its five stages of work to completion, and only then
+ * would `B` even start executing.
+ * With both `yield` calls, the coroutines share the single thread with each other after each stage of work.
+ * This is useful when several coroutines running on the same thread (or thread pool) must regularly publish
+ * their results for the program to stay responsive.
+ * 
  * This suspending function is cancellable: if the [Job] of the current coroutine is cancelled while
  * [yield] is invoked or while waiting for dispatch, it immediately resumes with [CancellationException].
  * There is a **prompt cancellation guarantee**: even if this function is ready to return the result, but was cancelled
  * while suspended, [CancellationException] will be thrown. See [suspendCancellableCoroutine] for low-level details.
  *
- * **Note**: This function always [checks for cancellation][ensureActive] even when it does not suspend.
+ * **Note**: if there is only a single coroutine executing on the current dispatcher,
+ * it is possible that [yield] will not actually suspend.
+ * However, even in that case, the [check for cancellation][ensureActive] still happens.
+ *
+ * **Note**: if there is no [CoroutineDispatcher] in the context, it does not suspend.
+ *
+ * ## Pitfall: using `yield` to wait for something to happen
+ *
+ * Using `yield` for anything except a way to ensure responsiveness is often a problem.
+ * When possible, it is recommended to structure the code in terms of coroutines waiting for some events instead of
+ * yielding.
+ * Below, we list the common problems involving [yield] and outline how to avoid them.
+ *
+ * ### Case 1: using `yield` to ensure a specific interleaving of actions
+ *
+ * ```
+ * val singleThreadedDispatcher = Dispatchers.Default.limitedParallelism(1)
+ * withContext(singleThreadedDispatcher) {
+ *     var value: Int? = null
+ *     val job = launch { // a new coroutine on the same dispatcher
+ *         // yield() // uncomment to see the crash
+ *         value = 42
+ *         println("2. Value provided")
+ *     }
+ *     check(value == null)
+ *     println("No value yet!")
+ *     println("1. Awaiting the value...")
+ *     // ANTIPATTERN! DO NOT WRITE SUCH CODE!
+ *     yield() // allow the other coroutine to run
+ *     // job.join() // would work more reliably in this scenario!
+ *     check(value != null)
+ *     println("3. Obtained $value")
+ * }
+ * ```
+ *
+ * Here, [yield] allows `singleThreadedDispatcher` to execute the task that ultimately provides the `value`.
+ * Without the [yield], the `value != null` check would be executed directly after `Awaiting the value` is printed.
+ * However, if the value-producing coroutine is modified to suspend before providing the value, this will
+ * no longer work; explicitly waiting for the coroutine to finish via [Job.join] instead is robust against such changes.
+ *
+ * Therefore, it is an antipattern to use `yield` to synchronize code across several coroutines.
+ *
+ * ### Case 2: using `yield` in a loop to wait for something to happen
+ *
+ * ```
+ * val singleThreadedDispatcher = Dispatchers.Default.limitedParallelism(1)
+ * withContext(singleThreadedDispatcher) {
+ *     var value: Int? = null
+ *     val job = launch { // a new coroutine on the same dispatcher
+ *         delay(1.seconds)
+ *         value = 42
+ *     }
+ *     // ANTIPATTERN! DO NOT WRITE SUCH CODE!
+ *     while (value == null) {
+ *         yield() // allow the other coroutines to run
+ *     }
+ *     println("Obtained $value")
+ * }
+ * ```
+ *
+ * This example will lead to correct results no matter how much the value-producing coroutine suspends,
+ * but it is still flawed.
+ * For the one second that it takes for the other coroutine to obtain the value,
+ * `value == null` would be constantly re-checked, leading to unjustified resource consumption.
+ *
+ * In this specific case, [CompletableDeferred] can be used instead:
+ *
+ * ```
+ * val singleThreadedDispatcher = Dispatchers.Default.limitedParallelism(1)
+ * withContext(singleThreadedDispatcher) {
+ *     val deferred = CompletableDeferred<Int>()
+ *     val job = launch { // a new coroutine on the same dispatcher
+ *         delay(1.seconds)
+ *         deferred.complete(42)
+ *     }
+ *     val value = deferred.await()
+ *     println("Obtained $value")
+ * }
+ * ```
+ *
+ * `while (channel.isEmpty) { yield() }; channel.receive()` can be replaced with just `channel.receive()`;
+ * `while (job.isActive) { yield() }` can be replaced with [`job.join()`][Job.join];
+ * in both cases, this will avoid the unnecessary work of checking the loop conditions.
+ * In general, seek ways to allow a coroutine to stay suspended until it actually has useful work to do.
+ *
+ * ## Implementation details
  *
- * ### Implementation details
+ * Some coroutine dispatchers include optimizations that make yielding different from normal suspensions.
+ * For example, when yielding, [Dispatchers.Unconfined] checks whether there are any other coroutines in the event
+ * loop where the current coroutine executes; if not, the sole coroutine continues to execute without suspending.
+ * Also, `Dispatchers.IO` and `Dispatchers.Default` on the JVM tweak the scheduling behavior to improve liveness
+ * when `yield()` is used in a loop.
  *
- * If the coroutine dispatcher is [Unconfined][Dispatchers.Unconfined], this
- * functions suspends only when there are other unconfined coroutines working and forming an event-loop.
- * For other dispatchers, this function calls [CoroutineDispatcher.dispatch] and
- * always suspends to be resumed later regardless of the result of [CoroutineDispatcher.isDispatchNeeded].
- * If there is no [CoroutineDispatcher] in the context, it does not suspend.
+ * For custom implementations of [CoroutineDispatcher], this function checks [CoroutineDispatcher.isDispatchNeeded] and
+ * then invokes [CoroutineDispatcher.dispatch] regardless of the result; no way is provided to change this behavior.
  */
 public suspend fun yield(): Unit = suspendCoroutineUninterceptedOrReturn sc@ { uCont ->
     val context = uCont.context