Skip to content

Conversation

@Wynand
Copy link

@Wynand Wynand commented Sep 10, 2021

Currently ShortString(ss127"hello",5) errors, and this fixes that

@Wynand Wynand marked this pull request as draft September 10, 2021 17:54
@Wynand Wynand marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2021 19:25
Comment on lines +127 to +134
@test ShortString(
ss127"Be honest, do you actually need a string longer than this. Seriously. C'mon this is pretty long.",
127,
) == "Be honest, do you actually need a string longer than this. Seriously. C'mon this is pretty long."
@test ShortString(
ss63"Basically a fairly long string really", 63
) == "Basically a fairly long string really"
@test ShortString(ss31"A Longer String!!!", 31) == "A Longer String!!!"
Copy link
Member

@oxinabox oxinabox Sep 15, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need these test.
They don't test anything different do they?

We should test things with:

  • shortstring below maxlen
  • shortstring at maxlen
  • shortstring above maxlen

ss31"A Longer String!!!", 0
) == "A Longer String!!!"
@test_throws ErrorException ShortString(ss15"Short String!!!", 0) == "Short String!!!"
@test_throws ErrorException ShortString(ss7"ShrtStr", 0) == "ShrtStr"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Including the right-hand side == here seems like it is adding nothing?
It makes it unclear what should throw the error.

types, in order of their size, then one of those types will be used.
"""
ShortString(str::Union{String,SubString{String}}, maxlen = sizeof(str); types=def_types) =
ShortString(str::AbstractString, maxlen = sizeof(str); types=def_types) =
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If relaxing it always to AbstractString,
need to also test that Test.GenericString works

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants