Skip to content

Conversation

@pebeto
Copy link
Member

@pebeto pebeto commented Nov 6, 2025

Upgrading the LTS version is something already mentioned in JuliaAI/MLJ.jl#1143.

pebeto and others added 2 commits November 6, 2025 01:28
Co-authored-by: Dilum Aluthge <dilum@aluthge.com>
Co-authored-by: Dilum Aluthge <dilum@aluthge.com>
@DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member

You might also need to upgrade to a newer Documenter.jl version (https://github.com/pebeto/MLJLinearModels.jl/blob/6b282650d3eb1504de51f43a44725ebea86c15be/docs/Project.toml#L5 might be too old for Julia 1.10).

= MLJBase.mode.(ŷ)

mcr = MLJBase.misclassification_rate(ŷ, yc)
mcr = MLJ.misclassification_rate(ŷ, yc)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I doubt you really need MLJ here. The metrics used to be defined in MLJBase, but now they are provided by StatisticalMeasures.jl

RCall = "6f49c342-dc21-5d91-9882-a32aef131414"
RDatasets = "ce6b1742-4840-55fa-b093-852dadbb1d8b"
Random = "9a3f8284-a2c9-5f02-9a11-845980a1fd5c"
StableRNGs = "860ef19b-820b-49d6-a774-d7a799459cd3"
Copy link
Member

@ablaom ablaom Nov 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In my experience, having a separate test/Project.toml is problematic when deving several packages locally, and I moved away from this. Can we get rid of it altogether? Maybe this even fixes your LTS fail.

@ablaom
Copy link
Member

ablaom commented Nov 6, 2025

Thanks for jumping in with some maintanence here @pebeto.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants