Add files via upload

Author: RK-Sharath

DEBUGGING.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+Troubleshooting
+===============
+
+Watson Studio
+--------------
+
+* Make sure you follow the instructions as per the documentation to create the AutoAI service.
+* Ingest the dataset as specified.
+* Do not stop the AutoAI process abruptly after it has started.
+* Create a new experiment if you want to make changes to the settings.
+
+Jupyter Notebooks
+-----------------
+
+* Make sure the pip install ran correctly. You might need to restart the kernel and run the cells from the top after the pip install runs the first time.
+* Many of the cells rely on variables that are set in earlier cells. Some of these are cleared in later cells. Start over at the top when troubleshooting.
+* Many of the cells rely on service credentials from Bluemix that are set in earlier cells. Make sure to add your service credentials correctly. Run the cells from top down and evaluate the outcome.

MAINTAINERS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+## Maintainers Guide
+
+This guide is intended for maintainers — anybody with commit access to one or
+more Developer Journey repositories.
+
+## Methodology:
+
+A master branch. This branch MUST be releasable at all times. Commits and
+merges against this branch MUST contain only bugfixes and/or security fixes.
+Maintenance releases are tagged against master.
+
+A develop branch. This branch contains your proposed changes.
+
+The remainder of this document details how to merge pull requests to the
+repositories.
+
+## Merge approval
+
+The project maintainers use LGTM (Looks Good To Me) in comments on the code
+review to indicate acceptance. A change requires LGTMs from two of the members
+of the [journey_name-dev-admins](https://github.com/orgs/IBM/teams)
+team. If the code is written by a member, the change only requires one more
+LGTM.
+
+## Reviewing Pull Requests
+
+We recommend reviewing pull requests directly within GitHub. This allows a
+public commentary on changes, providing transparency for all users. When
+providing feedback be civil, courteous, and kind. Disagreement is fine, so
+long as the discourse is carried out politely. If we see a record of uncivil
+or abusive comments, we will revoke your commit privileges and invite you to
+leave the project.
+
+During your review, consider the following points:
+
+### Does the change have impact?
+
+While fixing typos is nice as it adds to the overall quality of the project,
+merging a typo fix at a time can be a waste of effort.
+(Merging many typo fixes because somebody reviewed the entire component,
+however, is useful!) Other examples to be wary of:
+
+Changes in variable names. Ask whether or not the change will make
+understanding the code easier, or if it could simply a personal preference
+on the part of the author.
+
+Essentially: feel free to close issues that do not have impact.
+
+### Do the changes make sense?
+
+If you do not understand what the changes are or what they accomplish,
+ask the author for clarification. Ask the author to add comments and/or
+clarify test case names to make the intentions clear.
+
+At times, such clarification will reveal that the author may not be using
+the code correctly, or is unaware of features that accommodate their needs.
+If you feel this is the case, work up a code sample that would address the
+issue for them, and feel free to close the issue once they confirm.
+
+### Is this a new feature? If so:
+
+Does the issue contain narrative indicating the need for the feature? If not,
+ask them to provide that information. Since the issue will be linked in the
+changelog, this will often be a user's first introduction to it.
+
+Are new unit tests in place that test all new behaviors introduced? If not, do
+not merge the feature until they are!
+Is documentation in place for the new feature? (See the documentation
+guidelines). If not do not merge the feature until it is!
+Is the feature necessary for general use cases? Try and keep the scope of any
+given component narrow. If a proposed feature does not fit that scope,
+recommend to the user that they maintain the feature on their own, and close
+the request. You may also recommend that they see if the feature gains traction
+amongst other users, and suggest they re-submit when they can show such support.