Skip to content

Conversation

@gmao-rreichle
Copy link
Contributor

Clean up programs, scripts, etc related to obsolete regrid.pl (replaced with remap_restarts.py in GEOS_Util repo)

Initial commit removes mk_GEOSldasRestarts.F90

More cleanup is probably needed.

Related PRs:
GEOS-ESM/GEOS_Util#113 (pointing to GCM v12 feature branch)

cc: @mathomp4 @weiyuan-jiang @biljanaorescanin

mathomp4 and others added 30 commits June 11, 2024 10:24
As we move to FMS in Baselibs, we shouldn't use the old `fms_r4` and `fms_r8` targets
anymore as they are non-standard. Instead we move to `FMS::fms_r4` and `FMS::fms_r8`.
sdrabenh and others added 21 commits August 27, 2025 10:04
Conditional is now consistent with v12 branch
@mathomp4 mathomp4 requested review from a team as code owners September 10, 2025 18:48
@mathomp4
Copy link
Member

@gmao-rreichle Would you like me to make a GEOSgcm v11 variant of GEOS-ESM/GEOS_Util#113 I mean, I feel fine removing regrid.pl from GEOSgcm v11 just as much as I would v12.

As long as @sdrabenh is fine doing so as well.

Copy link
Contributor

@zhaobin74 zhaobin74 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No problem with 0-diff.

@gmao-rreichle
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mathomp4 : These changes are meant to go into develop after develop has become the base for v12. The v11 model is still meant to support regrid.pl. Personally, I would have been ok with removing regrid.pl sooner, but as a group we decided to keep regrid.pl in v11.

@gmao-rreichle
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sdrabenh , @mathomp4 : Ouch, I probably messed up the present PR in my rush to get a new PR that goes into the v12 branch (#1157). Here's what I did:

  1. I took the branch associated with the present PR (clean up programs etc related to regrid.pl  #1057) (feature/rreichle/remove-regridpl)
  2. I used this branch to create a new PR to be merged into the v12 branch (v12 GCM: clean up programs etc related to regrid.pl #1157), and
  3. I merged "develop" into the branch.
  4. Finally, @mathomp4 merged the v12 branch (feature/sdrabenh/gcm_v12) into the branch.
    I should have created a copy of the branch before creating the new PR (v12 GCM: clean up programs etc related to regrid.pl #1157).
    So as of right now, the present PR is probably no good. But if we merge v12 GCM: clean up programs etc related to regrid.pl #1157, the desired changes should automatically find their way back into "develop", so I'm closing the present PR (clean up programs etc related to regrid.pl  #1057).
    Please let me know if you disagree

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

0 diff The changes in this pull request have verified to be zero-diff with the target branch. Contingent - DNA These changes are contingent on other PRs (DNA=do not approve)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants