Skip to content

Commit 78ed5df

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #59 from ComplexData-MILA/gh-actions/process-form-issue-58-1733817059
[Automatic PR] [Add publication]
2 parents 10d8f6a + d55e3a6 commit 78ed5df

File tree

1 file changed

+23
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+23
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 23 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
1+
---
2+
title: 'UTG: Towards a Unified View of Snapshot and Event Based Models for Temporal
3+
Graphs'
4+
venue: arXiv.org
5+
names: Shenyang Huang, Farimah Poursafaei, Reihaneh Rabbany, Guillaume Rabusseau,
6+
Emanuele Rossi
7+
tags:
8+
- arXiv.org
9+
link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12269
10+
author: Farimah Poursafaei
11+
categories: Publications
12+
13+
---
14+
15+
*{{ page.names }}*
16+
17+
**{{ page.venue }}**
18+
19+
{% include display-publication-links.html pub=page %}
20+
21+
## Abstract
22+
23+
Many real world graphs are inherently dynamic, constantly evolving with node and edge additions. These graphs can be represented by temporal graphs, either through a stream of edge events or a sequence of graph snapshots. Until now, the development of machine learning methods for both types has occurred largely in isolation, resulting in limited experimental comparison and theoretical crosspollination between the two. In this paper, we introduce Unified Temporal Graph (UTG), a framework that unifies snapshot-based and event-based machine learning models under a single umbrella, enabling models developed for one representation to be applied effectively to datasets of the other. We also propose a novel UTG training procedure to boost the performance of snapshot-based models in the streaming setting. We comprehensively evaluate both snapshot and event-based models across both types of temporal graphs on the temporal link prediction task. Our main findings are threefold: first, when combined with UTG training, snapshot-based models can perform competitively with event-based models such as TGN and GraphMixer even on event datasets. Second, snapshot-based models are at least an order of magnitude faster than most event-based models during inference. Third, while event-based methods such as NAT and DyGFormer outperforms snapshot-based methods on both types of temporal graphs, this is because they leverage joint neighborhood structural features thus emphasizing the potential to incorporate these features into snapshotbased models as well. These findings highlight the importance of comparing model architectures independent of the data format and suggest the potential of combining the efficiency of snapshot-based models with the performance of event-based models in the future.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)