You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 14, 2022. It is now read-only.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: architecture/README.md
+2-1Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ For each architecture example there will be corresponding detailed information.
15
15
| :--- | :--- |
16
16
|[AWS EC2 HA-Setup 1 Region / 2 Zones](aws-ec2-ha-one-region-2-zones)|Example deployment architecture based on classic AWS-EC2 instances for a high availability solution in an AWS region with 2 availability zones.|
17
17
|[Classic-Setup with native Filebeat](classic-simple-filebeat-native)|Very simple example of a classically deployed API gateway (3 nodes).|
18
+
|[Kubernetes/OpenShift deployment](kubernetes)|Deployment in a Docker-Orchestration framework such as Kubernetes|
18
19
19
20
# Architecture FAQ
20
21
@@ -24,7 +25,7 @@ No, the solution is designed to run based on Docker containers. It is also plann
24
25
25
26
## Can we get rid of API Builder and instead leverage policies in API Gateway/Manager for API detail lookup and other requirements?
26
27
27
-
No, a large part of the logic of the solution is in the API Builder application. Implementing this in policies might be possible, but managing & updating the individual customer installations would be very time-consuming and error-prone. So the customer has to reference the appropriate API builder image and you know by version exactly what code base the customer is running.
28
+
No, a large part of the logic of the solution is in the API Builder application. Implementing this in policies might be possible, but managing & updating the individual customer installations would be very time-consuming and error-prone. So the customer has to reference the appropriate API-Builder image and you know by version exactly what code base the customer is running.
28
29
29
30
## Can we minimize the number of dependencies? Elastic Search, Logstash, Kibana and FileBeat agents are mandatory. Can API Builder and MemCache be made optional?
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: helm/README.md
+4-4Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ is for an environment where the API management platform is external to Kubernete
33
33
34
34
Further deployment options and customizations are described in this document.
35
35
36
-

36
+

37
37
38
38
### Get started
39
39
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ Traffic accross the available Logstashes. With that, it works almost the same as
150
150
connections.
151
151
The following diagram illustrates the approach:
152
152
153
-

153
+

154
154
155
155
This is an example setup:
156
156
```
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ To customize the solution according to your needs, you can configure it using yo
266
266
We recommend that you create your own Helm chart that contains all the necessary resources.
267
267
You then link your custom resources in your `myvalues.yaml` for the final deployment of the solution. The following illustrates the recommended approach:
268
268
269
-

269
+

270
270
271
271
### Create your own Helm-Chart
272
272
```
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ If you are already running the Axway API management solution in a Kubernetes env
474
474
475
475
The following shows Filebeat and API-Management in a Kubernetes cluster:
476
476
477
-

477
+

478
478
479
479
One way to provide Filebeat with the necessary log files of the API-Gateway in a central volume. All API-Gateways write to this volume and Filebeat reads & streams the corresponding documents/events.
0 commit comments