Merge pull request #116 from josemoracard/jose7-12.2-Map_function_inside_variable

exercises 12.2-Map_function_inside_variable to 16-Techno_beat

Author: alesanchezr

.gitignore

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 !/exercises/*
 
 *.pyc
-__pycache__/
+
 .pytest_cache/
 
 !/.learn

exercises/12.2-Map_function_inside_variable/README.es.md

@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 # `12.2` Map function inside a variable
 
-La variable names contiene muchos nombres 😒 (daah...)
+La variable `names` contiene muchos nombres (😒 daah...)
 
-La función `prepender` almacenada en la variable devuelve lo que sea que se le pase pero agregando antes: `'My name is:'`
+La función ya definida `prepender` devuelve lo que sea que se le pase pero agregando antes: `'My name is: '`.
 
 ## 📝 Instrucciones:
 
 1. Por favor, mapea la lista de nombres usando la función `prepender` para crear una nueva lista que se parezca a esto:
 
-## Resultado Esperado:
+## 💻 Resultado esperado:
 
 ```py
 [ 'My name is: Alice',

exercises/12.2-Map_function_inside_variable/README.md

@@ -1,15 +1,14 @@
 # `12.2` Map function inside a variable
 
-The variable names contains a lot of names (:unamused: dugh...)
+The variable `names` contains a lot of names (😒 duh...)
 
-The function stored in the variable `prepender` returns whatever is passed to it but prepended with the string: `'My name is:'`.
+The already defined function `prepender` returns whatever is passed to it but is prepended with the string: `'My name is: '`.
 
-## 📝Instructions:
+## 📝 Instructions:
 
-1. Please map the names list  using the `prepender` function
-to create a new list that looks like this:
+1. Please map the names list using the `prepender` function to create a new list that looks like this:
 
-## Expected Result:
+## 💻 Expected result:
 
 ```py
 [ 'My name is: Alice',

exercises/12.2-Map_function_inside_variable/app.py

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
-names = ['Alice','Bob','Marry','Joe','Hilary','Stevia','Dylan']
+names = ['Alice', 'Bob', 'Marry', 'Joe', 'Hilary', 'Stevia', 'Dylan']
 
 def prepender(name):
     return "My name is: " + name
-#Your code go here:
+    
+# Your code here

exercises/12.2-Map_function_inside_variable/solution.hide.py

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+names = ['Alice', 'Bob', 'Marry', 'Joe', 'Hilary', 'Stevia', 'Dylan']
+
+def prepender(name):
+    return "My name is: " + name
+    
+# Your code here
+
+new_list = list(map(prepender, names))
+
+print(new_list)

exercises/12.2-Map_function_inside_variable/test.py

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import io, sys, pytest, os, re
 path = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))+'/app.py'
 
-@pytest.mark.it("Print the all the names as in the output")
+@pytest.mark.it("Print all the names as in the output")
 def test_multp(capsys, app):
     import app
     captured = capsys.readouterr()
@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ def test_multp(capsys, app):
 def test_map():
     f = open(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)) + '/app.py')
     content = f.read()
-    assert content.find("map") > 0
+    assert content.find("map") > 0

exercises/12.3-Map_data_types/README.es.md

@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
-# `12.3` Map data type
+# `12.3` Map data types
 
 Muchas veces las listas vienen con valores mixtos y necesitamos unificarlos dentro de un solo tipo de datos.
 
 ## 📝 Instrucciones:
 
 1. Actualiza la función `type_list()` para hacer que cree una nueva lista (`new_list`) que contenga el tipo de dato que corresponde a cada elemento de la lista original.
 
-## 💡 Pista:
+## 💡 Pistas:
 
 + Usa la función `type()` para obtener el tipo de dato.
 
 + Más sobre tipos de datos: https://www.w3schools.com/python/python_datatypes.asp
 
-## Resultado esperado:
+## 💻 Resultado esperado:
 
 ```py
 [<class 'str'>, <class 'str'>, <class 'str'>, <class 'str'>, <class 'str'>, <class 'str'>, <class 'int'>, <class 'int'>]

exercises/12.3-Map_data_types/README.md

@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
 # `12.3` Map data types
 
-Some times lists come with mixed values and you need to unify them into only one data type.
+Sometimes lists come with mixed values, and you need to unify them into only one data type.
 
-## 📝Instructions:
+## 📝 Instructions:
 
-1. Update the map function to make it create a **new list** that contains the data types of each corresponding item from the original list.
+1. Update the `type_list` function to make it create a `new_list` that contains the data types of each corresponding item from the original list.
 
-## 💡 Hint:
+## 💡 Hints:
 
 + Use the `type()` function to get the data type.
 
 + More about data type: https://www.w3schools.com/python/python_datatypes.asp
 
-## Expected result:
+## 💻 Expected result:
 
 ```py
 [<class 'str'>, <class 'str'>, <class 'str'>, <class 'str'>, <class 'str'>, <class 'str'>, <class 'int'>, <class 'int'>]

exercises/12.3-Map_data_types/app.py

@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
-list_Strings = ['1','5','45','34','343','34',6556,323]
-
+mixed_list = ['1','5','45','34','343','34',6556,323]
 
 def type_list(items):
-        return items
+        # Your code here
+        return 
+
+new_list = list(map(type_list, mixed_list))
 
-new_list = list(map(type_list, list_Strings))
-print(new_list)
+print(new_list)

exercises/12.3-Map_data_types/solution.hide.py

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+mixed_list = ['1','5','45','34','343','34',6556,323]
+
+def type_list(items):
+        # Your code here
+        return type(items)
+
+new_list = list(map(type_list, mixed_list))
+
+print(new_list)